Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm: thp: make deferred split shrinker memcg aware

["Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>]

On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:06:36PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/11/19 7:47 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 02:07:37PM +0800, Yang Shi wrote:
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * The THP may be not on LRU at this point, e.g. the old page of
> > > +	 * NUMA migration.  And PageTransHuge is not enough to distinguish
> > > +	 * with other compound page, e.g. skb, THP destructor is not used
> > > +	 * anymore and will be removed, so the compound order sounds like
> > > +	 * the only choice here.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	if (PageTransHuge(page) && compound_order(page) == HPAGE_PMD_ORDER) {
> > What happens if the page is the same order as THP is not THP? Why removing
> 
> It may corrupt the deferred split queue since it is never added into the
> list, but deleted here.
> 
> > of destructor is required?
> 
> Due to the change to free_transhuge_page() (extracted deferred split queue
> manipulation and moved before memcg uncharge since page->mem_cgroup is
> needed), it just calls free_compound_page(). So, it sounds pointless to
> still keep THP specific destructor.
> 
> It looks there is not a good way to tell if the compound page is THP in
> free_page path or not, we may keep the destructor just for this?

Other option would be to move mem_cgroup_uncharge(page); from
__page_cache_release() to destructors. Destructors will be able to
call it as it fits.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov