From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: "Chengang (L)" <cg.chen@huawei.com>
Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"vbabka@suse.cz" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"osalvador@suse.de" <osalvador@suse.de>,
"pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com" <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>,
"mgorman@techsingularity.net" <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
"rppt@linux.ibm.com" <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
"richard.weiyang@gmail.com" <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
"alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com"
<alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: align up min_free_kbytes to multipy of 4
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:08:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190611130820.GI2388@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D27E5778F399414A8B5D5F672064BAD8B3E5FB7B@dggemi529-mbs.china.huawei.com>
On Tue 11-06-19 12:16:35, Chengang (L) wrote:
> Hi Michal
>
>
> >On Sun 09-06-19 17:10:28, ChenGang wrote:
> >> Usually the value of min_free_kbytes is multiply of 4, and in this
> >> case ,the right shift is ok.
> >> But if it's not, the right-shifting operation will lose the low 2
> >> bits, and this cause kernel don't reserve enough memory.
> >> So it's necessary to align the value of min_free_kbytes to multiply of 4.
> >> For example, if min_free_kbytes is 64, then should keep 16 pages, but
> >> if min_free_kbytes is 65 or 66, then should keep 17 pages.
>
> >Could you describe the actual problem? Do we ever generate min_free_kbytes that would lead to unexpected reserves or is this trying to compensate for those values being configured from the userspace? If later why do we care at all?
>
> >Have you seen this to be an actual problem or is this mostly motivated by the code reading?
>
> I haven't seen an actual problem, and it's motivated by code
> reading. Users can configure this value through interface
> /proc/sys/vm/min_free_kbytes, so I think a bit precious is better.
The interface is intended for admins and they should better know what
they are doing, right? Using an ad-hoc valus is not something that is a
common usecase.
That being said, your change makes the code slightly harder to read and
the benefit is not entirely clear from the changelog (which btw. sounds
like there is a real problem which is not described in the user visible
terms). So if you really believe this change is worth it, then make sure
you justify it by exaplain what is a negative consequence of a dubious
value set by an admin.
> >> Signed-off-by: ChenGang <cg.chen@huawei.com>
> >> ---
> >> mm/page_alloc.c | 3 ++-
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index d66bc8a..1baeeba
> >> 100644
> >> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> >> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> >> @@ -7611,7 +7611,8 @@ static void setup_per_zone_lowmem_reserve(void)
> >>
> >> static void __setup_per_zone_wmarks(void) {
> >> - unsigned long pages_min = min_free_kbytes >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 10);
> >> + unsigned long pages_min =
> >> + (PAGE_ALIGN(min_free_kbytes * 1024) / 1024) >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 10);
> >> unsigned long lowmem_pages = 0;
> >> struct zone *zone;
> >> unsigned long flags;
> >> --
> >> 1.8.5.6
> >>
>
> >--
> >Michal Hocko
> >SUSE Labs
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-11 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-11 12:16 Chengang (L)
2019-06-11 13:08 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-06-11 12:10 Chengang (L)
2019-06-09 9:10 ChenGang
2019-06-09 14:53 ` Wei Yang
2019-06-10 7:26 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190611130820.GI2388@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cg.chen@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox