From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
Cc: <osalvador@suse.de>, <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<mhocko@suse.com>, <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
<aarcange@redhat.com>, <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mempolicy: Fix an incorrect rebind node in mpol_rebind_nodemask
Date: Sat, 25 May 2019 11:28:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190525112851.ee196bcbbc33bf9e0d869236@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1558768043-23184-1-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com>
(Cc Vlastimil)
On Sat, 25 May 2019 15:07:23 +0800 zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> wrote:
> We bind an different node to different vma, Unluckily,
> it will bind different vma to same node by checking the /proc/pid/numa_maps.
> Commit 213980c0f23b ("mm, mempolicy: simplify rebinding mempolicies when updating cpusets")
> has introduced the issue. when we change memory policy by seting cpuset.mems,
> A process will rebind the specified policy more than one times.
> if the cpuset_mems_allowed is not equal to user specified nodes. hence the issue will trigger.
> Maybe result in the out of memory which allocating memory from same node.
>
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ static void mpol_rebind_nodemask(struct mempolicy *pol, const nodemask_t *nodes)
> else {
> nodes_remap(tmp, pol->v.nodes,pol->w.cpuset_mems_allowed,
> *nodes);
> - pol->w.cpuset_mems_allowed = tmp;
> + pol->w.cpuset_mems_allowed = *nodes;
> }
>
> if (nodes_empty(tmp))
hm, I'm not surprised the code broke. What the heck is going on in
there? It used to have a perfunctory comment, but Vlastimil deleted
it.
Could someone please propose a comment for the above code block
explaining why we're doing what we do?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-25 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-25 7:07 zhong jiang
2019-05-25 18:28 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2019-05-27 12:23 ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-05-27 13:58 ` zhong jiang
2019-06-27 3:57 ` Andrew Morton
2019-06-27 7:47 ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-06-27 9:59 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190525112851.ee196bcbbc33bf9e0d869236@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=zhongjiang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox