From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F31C04AB1 for ; Mon, 13 May 2019 21:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9297216E3 for ; Mon, 13 May 2019 21:02:04 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B9297216E3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 35A7F6B000A; Mon, 13 May 2019 17:02:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 2E6826B000C; Mon, 13 May 2019 17:02:04 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 137A46B000D; Mon, 13 May 2019 17:02:04 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from mail-pf1-f198.google.com (mail-pf1-f198.google.com [209.85.210.198]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70C26B000A for ; Mon, 13 May 2019 17:02:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pf1-f198.google.com with SMTP id r75so2225429pfc.15 for ; Mon, 13 May 2019 14:02:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-original-authentication-results:x-gm-message-state:date:from:to :cc:subject:references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent:message-id; bh=Hz9unt/uciM/ygAmqtld9GENvR5FMLR6DW0Up+uWrL8=; b=kbF1CiD2yv6wggmFMGTBAx6sFgWHrjzyPqrZCrH3KqszIbu39vq6/c9VfxlSkeDPOk KN3nNKqTK9g3PH6yGyPr794LBuuwZJ0EeoR/iAeOWmjZeP48W2ecp4RGcDlfVn61SGJ3 8rB+fKHegVh7LyN7Bch6//PSYmexWl17tfEJHsZ4WQPwhQ6Peb+f/YMIhzmsDQuveVFA Su4ncoSS4aQRVYJ90pPSZJWO2jJEL1LxmROvc01VWfi1p7HrKDb902zar4z7zW3l7ceL oHHNVblWSTdkUVfkHSgQEwVLHFjQfYUNqqbDYnnfZgKDDZNRS5LwkbXFdN6TKD3N5cji PydA== X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rppt@linux.ibm.com designates 148.163.156.1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rppt@linux.ibm.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUQNWjcVbnoysF3WA0jmM8+UOsZYhXEraC3N+dNnelp0C7mf9Yn 1L2yFwWX/uK6BzbZuJKkRwhCTaHwDS2Z7JYPewGFNbptBYP6kBy2+FdxJt9JUxkGOZCHM6JrDT2 gcNpj5FEYfmm0gLnSw6iXxx8oDPR3A8cJNLIIih74bX2KnwmZSd7EdUZoJdAD1PaX8g== X-Received: by 2002:a62:5f42:: with SMTP id t63mr10968229pfb.83.1557781323412; Mon, 13 May 2019 14:02:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxtkSOXd9NcGN5ARMK4YmRnfMV7VcunPuCg1C03fE3fjVYqfTyF6k3EhgmbBY/wP3zXS2bZ X-Received: by 2002:a62:5f42:: with SMTP id t63mr10968081pfb.83.1557781322099; Mon, 13 May 2019 14:02:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1557781322; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=QdsZqnIiQXEd5lXDwMc95mzFNmPkZpieoZLZML4QRoF+YEjsP8jlsVONB8V+dzA/tN 5rPgeHLJn1F2UQjZ8wZGOSIvC/K3jPFTjtHkYyxz7rNf5lZJF9dz5nPC6Z0M+oMQEWwh 9gF6iUgAN9SQhZtOOXLuKT6kQGTV9bEUiPMzmm5mWCzht8D8tK9Z5pLUVSaNcpJB/sZp U83Jy+6PQaN5/Ntl+IFgOM+yyEIC8jRAtsR19WK1tLAC7QnWJH8eDFPvL3w0yu+3UIRo 25LEB9J4QM6VvUWKv87TsN82qYolsN6o2AN3gRFgr6chFxzAYMQZCZKD69RlRWdgiWwd S8PQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=Hz9unt/uciM/ygAmqtld9GENvR5FMLR6DW0Up+uWrL8=; b=fja0YjPOZhMplumZzvnKlPR3mJOepXGsK4kblNgsU8WltP65URk3Obb1vLuMseF0iv npWYj6Tp5RQh4AvNSUgCkZr+7AW2jtYq1rl/+IuJncqE74Fj2qfuTCqxqMmXdt7YZ9qC LiARckySxAAutHn6iSfez6N3+MVXm8G/4yR+G3A+gQe48tnMmTewDcIyXgrQBQwaVL1d ealwD9ogVM0fuzPHT/qxXhms0ieDx3zgnt3VFKfr/jxVdfPwJuenNjneDj+32Sb6Kvun NZJ2pkBPrnv0e2oNeBp8YL3pHe3bvpx39wL8agH9Dle7LZoLCqRO0SEVUmXftjKePXCb qnzA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rppt@linux.ibm.com designates 148.163.156.1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rppt@linux.ibm.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com. [148.163.156.1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y3si16835843plt.133.2019.05.13.14.02.01 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 May 2019 14:02:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rppt@linux.ibm.com designates 148.163.156.1 as permitted sender) client-ip=148.163.156.1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rppt@linux.ibm.com designates 148.163.156.1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rppt@linux.ibm.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x4DKwTvW029170 for ; Mon, 13 May 2019 17:02:01 -0400 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2sferdk6yp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 13 May 2019 17:02:01 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 13 May 2019 22:01:58 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 13 May 2019 22:01:53 +0100 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x4DL1qrL54722776 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 13 May 2019 21:01:52 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420FFA404D; Mon, 13 May 2019 21:01:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FEF5A4040; Mon, 13 May 2019 21:01:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rapoport-lnx (unknown [9.148.207.233]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 13 May 2019 21:01:50 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 00:01:48 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Dan Williams Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, David Hildenbrand , Jane Chu , Michael Ellerman , Pavel Tatashin , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Robin Murphy , Anshuman Khandual , Logan Gunthorpe , Paul Mackerras , Toshi Kani , Oscar Salvador , Jeff Moyer , Michal Hocko , Vlastimil Babka , stable@vger.kernel.org, =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly9G1l?= Glisse , linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/12] mm: Sub-section memory hotplug support References: <155718596657.130019.17139634728875079809.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <155718596657.130019.17139634728875079809.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19051321-4275-0000-0000-000003345D88 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19051321-4276-0000-0000-00003843DADB Message-Id: <20190513210148.GA21574@rapoport-lnx> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-05-13_13:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1905130139 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hi Dan, On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 04:39:26PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > Changes since v7 [1]: Sorry for jumping late, but presuming there will be v9, it'd be great if it would also include include updates to Documentation/admin-guide/mm/memory-hotplug.rst and Documentation/vm/memory-model.rst > - Make subsection helpers pfn based rather than physical-address based > (Oscar and Pavel) > > - Make subsection bitmap definition scalable for different section and > sub-section sizes across architectures. As a result: > > unsigned long map_active > > ...is converted to: > > DECLARE_BITMAP(subsection_map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION) > > ...and the helpers are renamed with a 'subsection' prefix. (Pavel) > > - New in this version is a touch of arch/powerpc/include/asm/sparsemem.h > in "[PATCH v8 01/12] mm/sparsemem: Introduce struct mem_section_usage" > to define ARCH_SUBSECTION_SHIFT. > > - Drop "mm/sparsemem: Introduce common definitions for the size and mask > of a section" in favor of Robin's "mm/memremap: Rename and consolidate > SECTION_SIZE" (Pavel) > > - Collect some more Reviewed-by tags. Patches that still lack review > tags: 1, 3, 9 - 12 > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/155677652226.2336373.8700273400832001094.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com/ > > --- > [merge logistics] > > Hi Andrew, > > These are too late for v5.2, I'm posting this v8 during the merge window > to maintain the review momentum. > > --- > [cover letter] > > The memory hotplug section is an arbitrary / convenient unit for memory > hotplug. 'Section-size' units have bled into the user interface > ('memblock' sysfs) and can not be changed without breaking existing > userspace. The section-size constraint, while mostly benign for typical > memory hotplug, has and continues to wreak havoc with 'device-memory' > use cases, persistent memory (pmem) in particular. Recall that pmem uses > devm_memremap_pages(), and subsequently arch_add_memory(), to allocate a > 'struct page' memmap for pmem. However, it does not use the 'bottom > half' of memory hotplug, i.e. never marks pmem pages online and never > exposes the userspace memblock interface for pmem. This leaves an > opening to redress the section-size constraint. > > To date, the libnvdimm subsystem has attempted to inject padding to > satisfy the internal constraints of arch_add_memory(). Beyond > complicating the code, leading to bugs [2], wasting memory, and limiting > configuration flexibility, the padding hack is broken when the platform > changes this physical memory alignment of pmem from one boot to the > next. Device failure (intermittent or permanent) and physical > reconfiguration are events that can cause the platform firmware to > change the physical placement of pmem on a subsequent boot, and device > failure is an everyday event in a data-center. > > It turns out that sections are only a hard requirement of the > user-facing interface for memory hotplug and with a bit more > infrastructure sub-section arch_add_memory() support can be added for > kernel internal usages like devm_memremap_pages(). Here is an analysis > of the current design assumptions in the current code and how they are > addressed in the new implementation: > > Current design assumptions: > > - Sections that describe boot memory (early sections) are never > unplugged / removed. > > - pfn_valid(), in the CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP=y, case devolves to a > valid_section() check > > - __add_pages() and helper routines assume all operations occur in > PAGES_PER_SECTION units. > > - The memblock sysfs interface only comprehends full sections > > New design assumptions: > > - Sections are instrumented with a sub-section bitmask to track (on x86) > individual 2MB sub-divisions of a 128MB section. > > - Partially populated early sections can be extended with additional > sub-sections, and those sub-sections can be removed with > arch_remove_memory(). With this in place we no longer lose usable memory > capacity to padding. > > - pfn_valid() is updated to look deeper than valid_section() to also check the > active-sub-section mask. This indication is in the same cacheline as > the valid_section() so the performance impact is expected to be > negligible. So far the lkp robot has not reported any regressions. > > - Outside of the core vmemmap population routines which are replaced, > other helper routines like shrink_{zone,pgdat}_span() are updated to > handle the smaller granularity. Core memory hotplug routines that deal > with online memory are not touched. > > - The existing memblock sysfs user api guarantees / assumptions are > not touched since this capability is limited to !online > !memblock-sysfs-accessible sections. > > Meanwhile the issue reports continue to roll in from users that do not > understand when and how the 128MB constraint will bite them. The current > implementation relied on being able to support at least one misaligned > namespace, but that immediately falls over on any moderately complex > namespace creation attempt. Beyond the initial problem of 'System RAM' > colliding with pmem, and the unsolvable problem of physical alignment > changes, Linux is now being exposed to platforms that collide pmem > ranges with other pmem ranges by default [3]. In short, > devm_memremap_pages() has pushed the venerable section-size constraint > past the breaking point, and the simplicity of section-aligned > arch_add_memory() is no longer tenable. > > These patches are exposed to the kbuild robot on my libnvdimm-pending > branch [4], and a preview of the unit test for this functionality is > available on the 'subsection-pending' branch of ndctl [5]. > > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/155000671719.348031.2347363160141119237.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com > [3]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl/issues/76 > [4]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/djbw/nvdimm.git/log/?h=libnvdimm-pending > [5]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl/commit/7c59b4867e1c > > --- > > Dan Williams (11): > mm/sparsemem: Introduce struct mem_section_usage > mm/sparsemem: Add helpers track active portions of a section at boot > mm/hotplug: Prepare shrink_{zone,pgdat}_span for sub-section removal > mm/sparsemem: Convert kmalloc_section_memmap() to populate_section_memmap() > mm/hotplug: Kill is_dev_zone() usage in __remove_pages() > mm: Kill is_dev_zone() helper > mm/sparsemem: Prepare for sub-section ranges > mm/sparsemem: Support sub-section hotplug > mm/devm_memremap_pages: Enable sub-section remap > libnvdimm/pfn: Fix fsdax-mode namespace info-block zero-fields > libnvdimm/pfn: Stop padding pmem namespaces to section alignment > > Robin Murphy (1): > mm/memremap: Rename and consolidate SECTION_SIZE > > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/sparsemem.h | 3 > arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 4 > drivers/nvdimm/dax_devs.c | 2 > drivers/nvdimm/pfn.h | 15 - > drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c | 95 +++------ > include/linux/memory_hotplug.h | 7 - > include/linux/mm.h | 4 > include/linux/mmzone.h | 93 +++++++-- > kernel/memremap.c | 63 ++---- > mm/hmm.c | 2 > mm/memory_hotplug.c | 172 +++++++++------- > mm/page_alloc.c | 8 - > mm/sparse-vmemmap.c | 21 +- > mm/sparse.c | 369 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > 14 files changed, 511 insertions(+), 347 deletions(-) > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.