From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@suse.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, hughd@google.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: correct nr_reclaimed for THP
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 09:36:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190510163612.GA23417@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y33fjbvr.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 10:12:40AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> > + nr_reclaimed += (1 << compound_order(page));
>
> How about to change this to
>
>
> nr_reclaimed += hpage_nr_pages(page);
Please don't. That embeds the knowledge that we can only swap out either
normal pages or THP sized pages. I'm trying to make the VM capable of
supporting arbitrary-order pages, and this would be just one more place
to fix.
I'm sympathetic to the "self documenting" argument. My current tree has
a patch in it:
mm: Introduce compound_nr
Replace 1 << compound_order(page) with compound_nr(page). Minor
improvements in readability.
It goes along with this patch:
mm: Introduce page_size()
It's unnecessarily hard to find out the size of a potentially huge page.
Replace 'PAGE_SIZE << compound_order(page)' with page_size(page).
Better suggestions on naming gratefully received. I'm more happy with
page_size() than I am with compound_nr(). page_nr() gives the wrong
impression; page_count() isn't great either.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-10 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-10 0:16 Yang Shi
2019-05-10 0:39 ` Shakeel Butt
2019-05-10 2:12 ` Huang, Ying
2019-05-10 2:25 ` Yang Shi
2019-05-10 3:03 ` Huang, Ying
2019-05-10 4:33 ` William Kucharski
2019-05-10 15:48 ` Yang Shi
2019-05-10 15:41 ` Yang Shi
2019-05-10 16:36 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2019-05-10 16:50 ` Yang Shi
2019-05-10 16:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-05-10 16:54 ` Yang Shi
2019-05-10 22:54 ` Ira Weiny
2019-05-10 23:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-05-11 4:09 ` Yafang Shao
2019-05-11 22:33 ` William Kucharski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190510163612.GA23417@bombadil.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox