linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>,
	Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] lib/test_vmalloc: do not create cpumask_t variable on stack
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 15:10:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190418151033.9e46ec06c1d7482e6dee14bc@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190418193925.9361-1-urezki@gmail.com>

On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 21:39:25 +0200 "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com> wrote:

> On my "Intel(R) Xeon(R) W-2135 CPU @ 3.70GHz" system(12 CPUs)
> i get the warning from the compiler about frame size:
> 
> <snip>
> warning: the frame size of 1096 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes
> [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> <snip>
> 
> the size of cpumask_t depends on number of CPUs, therefore just
> make use of cpumask_of() in set_cpus_allowed_ptr() as a second
> argument.
> 
> ...
L
> --- a/lib/test_vmalloc.c
> +++ b/lib/test_vmalloc.c
> @@ -383,14 +383,14 @@ static void shuffle_array(int *arr, int n)
>  static int test_func(void *private)
>  {
>  	struct test_driver *t = private;
> -	cpumask_t newmask = CPU_MASK_NONE;
>  	int random_array[ARRAY_SIZE(test_case_array)];
>  	int index, i, j, ret;
>  	ktime_t kt;
>  	u64 delta;
>  
> -	cpumask_set_cpu(t->cpu, &newmask);
> -	set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &newmask);
> +	ret = set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(t->cpu));
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		pr_err("Failed to set affinity to %d CPU\n", t->cpu);
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_case_array); i++)
>  		random_array[i] = i;

lgtm.

While we're in there...


From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: lib/test_vmalloc.c:test_func(): eliminate local `ret'

Local 'ret' is unneeded and was poorly named: the variable `ret' generally
means the "the value which this function will return".

Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>
Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 lib/test_vmalloc.c |    8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/lib/test_vmalloc.c~a
+++ a/lib/test_vmalloc.c
@@ -384,12 +384,11 @@ static int test_func(void *private)
 {
 	struct test_driver *t = private;
 	int random_array[ARRAY_SIZE(test_case_array)];
-	int index, i, j, ret;
+	int index, i, j;
 	ktime_t kt;
 	u64 delta;
 
-	ret = set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(t->cpu));
-	if (ret < 0)
+	if (set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(t->cpu)) < 0)
 		pr_err("Failed to set affinity to %d CPU\n", t->cpu);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_case_array); i++)
@@ -415,8 +414,7 @@ static int test_func(void *private)
 
 		kt = ktime_get();
 		for (j = 0; j < test_repeat_count; j++) {
-			ret = test_case_array[index].test_func();
-			if (!ret)
+			if (!test_case_array[index].test_func())
 				per_cpu_test_data[t->cpu][index].test_passed++;
 			else
 				per_cpu_test_data[t->cpu][index].test_failed++;
_


  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-18 22:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-18 19:39 Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2019-04-18 22:10 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2019-04-19 11:06   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2019-04-19 19:49 ` Roman Gushchin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190418151033.9e46ec06c1d7482e6dee14bc@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thgarnie@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox