linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mm,memory_hotplug: allocate memmap from hotadded memory
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 10:12:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190403081232.GB15605@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190403080113.adj2m3szhhnvzu56@d104.suse.de>

On Wed 03-04-19 10:01:16, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 02:48:45PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > So what is going to happen when you hotadd two memblocks. The first one
> > holds memmaps and then you want to hotremove (not just offline) it?
> 
> If you hot-add two memblocks, this means that either:
> 
> a) you hot-add a 256MB-memory-device (128MB per memblock)
> b) you hot-add two 128MB-memory-device
> 
> Either way, hot-removing only works for memory-device as a whole, so
> there is no problem.
> 
> Vmemmaps are created per hot-added operations, this means that
> vmemmaps will be created for the hot-added range.
> And since hot-add/hot-remove operations works with the same granularity,
> there is no problem.

What does prevent calling somebody arch_add_memory for a range spanning
multiple memblocks from a driver directly. In other words aren't you
making  assumptions about a future usage based on the qemu usecase?

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs


  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-03  8:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-28 13:43 Oscar Salvador
2019-03-28 13:43 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm, memory_hotplug: cleanup memory offline path Oscar Salvador
2019-04-03  8:43   ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-28 13:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm, memory_hotplug: provide a more generic restrictions for memory hotplug Oscar Salvador
2019-04-03  8:46   ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-03  8:48     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-04 10:04     ` Oscar Salvador
2019-04-04 10:06       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-04 10:31       ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-04 12:04         ` Oscar Salvador
2019-03-28 13:43 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm, memory_hotplug: allocate memmap from the added memory range for sparse-vmemmap Oscar Salvador
2019-03-28 13:43 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm, sparse: rename kmalloc_section_memmap, __kfree_section_memmap Oscar Salvador
2019-03-28 15:09 ` [PATCH 0/4] mm,memory_hotplug: allocate memmap from hotadded memory David Hildenbrand
2019-03-28 15:31   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-03-29  8:45     ` Oscar Salvador
2019-03-29  8:56       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-03-29  9:01         ` David Hildenbrand
2019-03-29  9:20         ` Oscar Salvador
2019-03-29 13:42       ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-01  7:59         ` Oscar Salvador
2019-04-01 11:53           ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-02  8:28             ` Oscar Salvador
2019-04-02  8:39               ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-02 12:48               ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-03  8:01                 ` Oscar Salvador
2019-04-03  8:12                   ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2019-04-03  8:17                     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-03  8:37                       ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-03  8:41                         ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-03  8:49                           ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-03  8:53                             ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-03  8:50                           ` Oscar Salvador
2019-04-03  8:54                             ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-03  9:40                         ` Oscar Salvador
2019-04-03 10:46                           ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-04 10:25                           ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-04-03  8:34                     ` Oscar Salvador
2019-04-03  8:36                       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-03-29  8:30   ` Oscar Salvador
2019-03-29  8:51     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-03-29 22:23 ` John Hubbard
2019-04-01  7:52   ` Oscar Salvador

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190403081232.GB15605@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox