From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com>,
zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.0 037/262] mm, mempolicy: fix uninit memory access
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 13:58:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190327180158.10245-37-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190327180158.10245-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
[ Upstream commit 2e25644e8da4ed3a27e7b8315aaae74660be72dc ]
Syzbot with KMSAN reports (excerpt):
==================================================================
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in mpol_rebind_policy mm/mempolicy.c:353 [inline]
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in mpol_rebind_mm+0x249/0x370 mm/mempolicy.c:384
CPU: 1 PID: 17420 Comm: syz-executor4 Not tainted 4.20.0-rc7+ #15
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS
Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
dump_stack+0x173/0x1d0 lib/dump_stack.c:113
kmsan_report+0x12e/0x2a0 mm/kmsan/kmsan.c:613
__msan_warning+0x82/0xf0 mm/kmsan/kmsan_instr.c:295
mpol_rebind_policy mm/mempolicy.c:353 [inline]
mpol_rebind_mm+0x249/0x370 mm/mempolicy.c:384
update_tasks_nodemask+0x608/0xca0 kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:1120
update_nodemasks_hier kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:1185 [inline]
update_nodemask kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:1253 [inline]
cpuset_write_resmask+0x2a98/0x34b0 kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:1728
...
Uninit was created at:
kmsan_save_stack_with_flags mm/kmsan/kmsan.c:204 [inline]
kmsan_internal_poison_shadow+0x92/0x150 mm/kmsan/kmsan.c:158
kmsan_kmalloc+0xa6/0x130 mm/kmsan/kmsan_hooks.c:176
kmem_cache_alloc+0x572/0xb90 mm/slub.c:2777
mpol_new mm/mempolicy.c:276 [inline]
do_mbind mm/mempolicy.c:1180 [inline]
kernel_mbind+0x8a7/0x31a0 mm/mempolicy.c:1347
__do_sys_mbind mm/mempolicy.c:1354 [inline]
As it's difficult to report where exactly the uninit value resides in
the mempolicy object, we have to guess a bit. mm/mempolicy.c:353
contains this part of mpol_rebind_policy():
if (!mpol_store_user_nodemask(pol) &&
nodes_equal(pol->w.cpuset_mems_allowed, *newmask))
"mpol_store_user_nodemask(pol)" is testing pol->flags, which I couldn't
ever see being uninitialized after leaving mpol_new(). So I'll guess
it's actually about accessing pol->w.cpuset_mems_allowed on line 354,
but still part of statement starting on line 353.
For w.cpuset_mems_allowed to be not initialized, and the nodes_equal()
reachable for a mempolicy where mpol_set_nodemask() is called in
do_mbind(), it seems the only possibility is a MPOL_PREFERRED policy
with empty set of nodes, i.e. MPOL_LOCAL equivalent, with MPOL_F_LOCAL
flag. Let's exclude such policies from the nodes_equal() check. Note
the uninit access should be benign anyway, as rebinding this kind of
policy is always a no-op. Therefore no actual need for stable
inclusion.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/a71997c3-e8ae-a787-d5ce-3db05768b27c@suse.cz
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/73da3e9c-cc84-509e-17d9-0c434bb9967d@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Reported-by: syzbot+b19c2dc2c990ea657a71@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com>
Cc: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
mm/mempolicy.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index ee2bce59d2bf..846f80e212ac 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static void mpol_rebind_policy(struct mempolicy *pol, const nodemask_t *newmask)
{
if (!pol)
return;
- if (!mpol_store_user_nodemask(pol) &&
+ if (!mpol_store_user_nodemask(pol) && !(pol->flags & MPOL_F_LOCAL) &&
nodes_equal(pol->w.cpuset_mems_allowed, *newmask))
return;
--
2.19.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-27 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20190327180158.10245-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2019-03-27 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.0 015/262] memblock: memblock_phys_alloc_try_nid(): don't panic Sasha Levin
2019-03-28 5:57 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-04-04 0:57 ` Sasha Levin
2019-03-27 17:58 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.0 030/262] mm/sparse: fix a bad comparison Sasha Levin
2019-03-27 17:58 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.0 031/262] mm/cma.c: cma_declare_contiguous: correct err handling Sasha Levin
2019-03-27 17:58 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.0 032/262] mm/page_ext.c: fix an imbalance with kmemleak Sasha Levin
2019-03-27 17:58 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.0 033/262] mm, swap: bounds check swap_info array accesses to avoid NULL derefs Sasha Levin
2019-03-27 17:58 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.0 035/262] mm,oom: don't kill global init via memory.oom.group Sasha Levin
2019-03-27 17:58 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.0 036/262] memcg: killed threads should not invoke memcg OOM killer Sasha Levin
2019-03-27 17:58 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2019-03-27 17:58 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.0 038/262] mm/vmalloc.c: fix kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c:512! Sasha Levin
2019-03-27 17:58 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.0 039/262] mm/slab.c: kmemleak no scan alien caches Sasha Levin
2019-03-27 17:58 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.0 044/262] page_poison: play nicely with KASAN Sasha Levin
2019-03-27 17:58 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.0 045/262] kasan: fix kasan_check_read/write definitions Sasha Levin
2019-03-27 17:58 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.0 061/262] mm/resource: Return real error codes from walk failures Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190327180158.10245-37-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=xieyisheng1@huawei.com \
--cc=zhongjiang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox