linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Gushchin <guroan@gmail.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 6/6] mm: refactor memcg_hotplug_cpu_dead() to use memcg_flush_offline_percpu()
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 11:39:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190313183953.17854-7-guro@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190313183953.17854-1-guro@fb.com>

It's possible to remove a big chunk of the redundant code by making
memcg_flush_offline_percpu() to take cpumask as an argument and flush
percpu data on all cpus belonging to the mask instead of all possible cpus.

Then memcg_hotplug_cpu_dead() can call it with a single CPU bit set.

This approach allows to remove all duplicated code, but safe the
performance optimization made in memcg_flush_offline_percpu():
only one atomic operation per data entry.

for_each_data_entry()
	for_each_cpu(cpu. cpumask)
		sum_events()
	flush()

Otherwise it would be one atomic operation per data entry per cpu:
for_each_cpu(cpu)
	for_each_data_entry()
		flush()

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 61 ++++++++-----------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 0f18bf2afea8..5b6a2ea66774 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2122,11 +2122,12 @@ static void drain_all_stock(struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg)
 /*
  * Flush all per-cpu stats and events into atomics.
  * Try to minimize the number of atomic writes by gathering data from
- * all cpus locally, and then make one atomic update.
+ * all cpus in cpumask locally, and then make one atomic update.
  * No locking is required, because no one has an access to
  * the offlined percpu data.
  */
-static void memcg_flush_offline_percpu(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+static void memcg_flush_offline_percpu(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+				       const struct cpumask *cpumask)
 {
 	struct memcg_vmstats_percpu __percpu *vmstats_percpu;
 	struct lruvec_stat __percpu *lruvec_stat_cpu;
@@ -2140,7 +2141,7 @@ static void memcg_flush_offline_percpu(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 		int nid;
 
 		x = 0;
-		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+		for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask)
 			x += per_cpu(vmstats_percpu->stat[i], cpu);
 		if (x)
 			atomic_long_add(x, &memcg->vmstats[i]);
@@ -2153,7 +2154,7 @@ static void memcg_flush_offline_percpu(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 			lruvec_stat_cpu = pn->lruvec_stat_cpu_offlined;
 
 			x = 0;
-			for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+			for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask)
 				x += per_cpu(lruvec_stat_cpu->count[i], cpu);
 			if (x)
 				atomic_long_add(x, &pn->lruvec_stat[i]);
@@ -2162,7 +2163,7 @@ static void memcg_flush_offline_percpu(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < NR_VM_EVENT_ITEMS; i++) {
 		x = 0;
-		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+		for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask)
 			x += per_cpu(vmstats_percpu->events[i], cpu);
 		if (x)
 			atomic_long_add(x, &memcg->vmevents[i]);
@@ -2171,8 +2172,6 @@ static void memcg_flush_offline_percpu(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 
 static int memcg_hotplug_cpu_dead(unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	struct memcg_vmstats_percpu __percpu *vmstats_percpu;
-	struct lruvec_stat __percpu *lruvec_stat_cpu;
 	struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock;
 	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
 
@@ -2180,50 +2179,8 @@ static int memcg_hotplug_cpu_dead(unsigned int cpu)
 	drain_stock(stock);
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	for_each_mem_cgroup(memcg) {
-		int i;
-
-		vmstats_percpu = (struct memcg_vmstats_percpu __percpu *)
-			rcu_dereference(memcg->vmstats_percpu);
-
-		for (i = 0; i < MEMCG_NR_STAT; i++) {
-			int nid;
-			long x;
-
-			if (vmstats_percpu) {
-				x = this_cpu_xchg(vmstats_percpu->stat[i], 0);
-				if (x)
-					atomic_long_add(x, &memcg->vmstats[i]);
-			}
-
-			if (i >= NR_VM_NODE_STAT_ITEMS)
-				continue;
-
-			for_each_node(nid) {
-				struct mem_cgroup_per_node *pn;
-
-				pn = mem_cgroup_nodeinfo(memcg, nid);
-
-				lruvec_stat_cpu = (struct lruvec_stat __percpu*)
-					rcu_dereference(pn->lruvec_stat_cpu);
-				if (!lruvec_stat_cpu)
-					continue;
-				x = this_cpu_xchg(lruvec_stat_cpu->count[i], 0);
-				if (x)
-					atomic_long_add(x, &pn->lruvec_stat[i]);
-			}
-		}
-
-		for (i = 0; i < NR_VM_EVENT_ITEMS; i++) {
-			long x;
-
-			if (vmstats_percpu) {
-				x = this_cpu_xchg(vmstats_percpu->events[i], 0);
-				if (x)
-					atomic_long_add(x, &memcg->vmevents[i]);
-			}
-		}
-	}
+	for_each_mem_cgroup(memcg)
+		memcg_flush_offline_percpu(memcg, cpumask_of(cpu));
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	return 0;
@@ -4668,7 +4625,7 @@ static void percpu_rcu_free(struct rcu_head *rcu)
 	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = container_of(rcu, struct mem_cgroup, rcu);
 	int node;
 
-	memcg_flush_offline_percpu(memcg);
+	memcg_flush_offline_percpu(memcg, cpu_possible_mask);
 
 	for_each_node(node) {
 		struct mem_cgroup_per_node *pn = memcg->nodeinfo[node];
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-03-13 18:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-13 18:39 [PATCH v3 0/6] mm: reduce the memory footprint of dying memory cgroups Roman Gushchin
2019-03-13 18:39 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] mm: prepare to premature release of memcg->vmstats_percpu Roman Gushchin
2019-03-13 18:39 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] mm: prepare to premature release of per-node lruvec_stat_cpu Roman Gushchin
2019-03-13 18:39 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] mm: release memcg percpu data prematurely Roman Gushchin
2019-03-13 18:39 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] mm: release per-node " Roman Gushchin
2019-03-13 18:39 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] mm: flush memcg percpu stats and events before releasing Roman Gushchin
2019-03-13 18:39 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2019-03-13 19:48   ` [PATCH v3 6/6] mm: refactor memcg_hotplug_cpu_dead() to use memcg_flush_offline_percpu() Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190313183953.17854-7-guro@fb.com \
    --to=guroan@gmail.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox