From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] filemap: don't unlock null page in FGP_FOR_MMAP case
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 14:06:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190312140623.54e337e01eb9fbfe11258330@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190312201742.22935-1-josef@toxicpanda.com>
On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:17:42 -0400 Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> wrote:
> We noticed a panic happening in production with the filemap fault pages
> because we were unlocking a NULL page. If add_to_page_cache() fails
> then we'll have a NULL page, so fix this check to only unlock if we
> have a valid page.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
> ---
> mm/filemap.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> index cace3eb8069f..2815cb79a246 100644
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -1663,7 +1663,7 @@ struct page *pagecache_get_page(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t offset,
> * add_to_page_cache_lru locks the page, and for mmap we expect
> * an unlocked page.
> */
> - if (fgp_flags & FGP_FOR_MMAP)
> + if (page && (fgp_flags & FGP_FOR_MMAP))
> unlock_page(page);
> }
>
Fixes "filemap: kill page_cache_read usage in filemap_fault".
This patch series:
filemap-kill-page_cache_read-usage-in-filemap_fault.patch
filemap-kill-page_cache_read-usage-in-filemap_fault-fix.patch
filemap-kill-page_cache_read-usage-in-filemap_fault-fix-2.patch
filemap-pass-vm_fault-to-the-mmap-ra-helpers.patch
filemap-drop-the-mmap_sem-for-all-blocking-operations.patch
filemap-drop-the-mmap_sem-for-all-blocking-operations-v6.patch
filemap-drop-the-mmap_sem-for-all-blocking-operations-fix.patch
filemap-drop-the-mmap_sem-for-all-blocking-operations-checkpatch-fixes.patch
has been stuck since December. I have a note here that syzbot reported
a use-after-free. What's the situation with that?
I also have a cryptic note that
filemap-drop-the-mmap_sem-for-all-blocking-operations-v6.patch is
"still fishy". I'm not sure what I meant by the latter - the (small
amount of) review seems to be OK. Do you recall what issues there
might have been and the status of those?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-12 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-12 20:17 Josef Bacik
2019-03-12 21:06 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2019-03-13 14:25 ` Josef Bacik
2019-03-12 21:08 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190312140623.54e337e01eb9fbfe11258330@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox