From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: npiggin@gmail.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, x86@kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/5] NestMMU pte upgrade workaround for mprotect
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 11:39:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190228113945.9d268b76bae26707e569681b@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k1hltxoc.fsf@linux.ibm.com>
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:28:43 +0530 "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes:
>
> > [patch 1/5]: unreviewed and has unaddressed comments from mpe.
> > [patch 2/5]: ditto
> > [patch 3/5]: ditto
> > [patch 4/5]: seems ready
> > [patch 5/5]: reviewed by mpe, but appears to need more work
>
> That was mostly variable naming preferences. I like the christmas
> tree style not the inverted christmas tree. There is one detail about
> commit message, which indicate the change may be required by other
> architecture too. Was not sure whether that needed a commit message
> update.
>
> I didn't send an updated series because after replying to most of them I
> didn't find a strong request to get the required changes in. If you want
> me update the series with this variable name ordering and commit message
> update I can send a new series today.
>
OK, minor stuff.
The patches have been in -next for a month, which is good but we really
should get some review of the first three.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-28 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-16 8:50 Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-01-16 8:50 ` [PATCH V5 1/5] mm: Update ptep_modify_prot_start/commit to take vm_area_struct as arg Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-01-30 10:33 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-01-16 8:50 ` [PATCH V5 2/5] mm: update ptep_modify_prot_commit to take old pte value " Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-01-30 10:46 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-01-31 5:03 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-01-16 8:50 ` [PATCH V5 3/5] arch/powerpc/mm: Nest MMU workaround for mprotect RW upgrade Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-01-30 10:52 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-01-31 5:07 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-01-16 8:50 ` [PATCH V5 4/5] mm/hugetlb: Add prot_modify_start/commit sequence for hugetlb update Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-01-30 10:54 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-01-16 8:50 ` [PATCH V5 5/5] arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlb: NestMMU workaround for hugetlb mprotect RW upgrade Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-01-30 11:01 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-01-29 10:43 ` [PATCH V5 0/5] NestMMU pte upgrade workaround for mprotect Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-01-29 18:29 ` Andrew Morton
2019-02-26 23:37 ` Andrew Morton
2019-02-27 8:58 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-02-28 19:39 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190228113945.9d268b76bae26707e569681b@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox