From: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
To: Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>, "tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"van.freenix@gmail.com" <van.freenix@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] percpu: km: remove SMP check
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:03:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190226170339.GB47262@dennisz-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <010001692a612815-46229701-ea3f-4a89-8f88-0c74194ba257-000000@email.amazonses.com>
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 03:16:44PM +0000, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019, Dennis Zhou wrote:
>
> > > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
> > > * chunk size is not aligned. percpu-km code will whine about it.
> > > */
> > >
> > > -#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_NEED_PER_CPU_PAGE_FIRST_CHUNK)
> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_NEED_PER_CPU_PAGE_FIRST_CHUNK)
> > > #error "contiguous percpu allocation is incompatible with paged first chunk"
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.16.4
> > >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think keeping CONFIG_SMP makes this easier to remember dependencies
> > rather than having to dig into the config. So this is a NACK from me.
>
> But it simplifies the code and makes it easier to read.
>
>
I think the check isn't quite right after looking at it a little longer.
Looking at x86, I believe you can compile it with !SMP and
CONFIG_NEED_PER_CPU_PAGE_FIRST_CHUNK will still be set. This should
still work because x86 has an MMU.
I think more correctly it would be something like below, but I don't
have the time to fully verify it right now.
Thanks,
Dennis
---
diff --git a/mm/percpu-km.c b/mm/percpu-km.c
index 0f643dc2dc65..69ccad7d9807 100644
--- a/mm/percpu-km.c
+++ b/mm/percpu-km.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
* chunk size is not aligned. percpu-km code will whine about it.
*/
-#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_NEED_PER_CPU_PAGE_FIRST_CHUNK)
+#if !defined(CONFIG_MMU) && defined(CONFIG_NEED_PER_CPU_PAGE_FIRST_CHUNK)
#error "contiguous percpu allocation is incompatible with paged first chunk"
#endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-26 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-24 13:13 Peng Fan
2019-02-24 13:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] percpu: km: no need to consider pcpu_group_offsets[0] Peng Fan
2019-02-25 15:16 ` dennis
2019-02-26 0:03 ` Peng Fan
2019-02-26 15:15 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-02-26 16:31 ` Dennis Zhou
2019-02-25 15:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] percpu: km: remove SMP check Dennis Zhou
2019-02-25 23:58 ` Peng Fan
2019-02-26 15:16 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-02-26 17:03 ` Dennis Zhou [this message]
2019-02-27 13:02 ` Peng Fan
2019-02-27 16:41 ` Dennis Zhou
2019-03-03 8:49 ` Peng Fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190226170339.GB47262@dennisz-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com \
--to=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=van.freenix@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox