linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: "Bujnak, Stepan" <stepan@pex.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	mcgrof@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/oom: added option 'oom_dump_task_cmdline'
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 11:01:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190220100105.GW4525@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFZe2nQW3mUGgSVndzmPirz7BkVUCEyjt=hgxqFn=bntrCsC8A@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed 20-02-19 09:37:56, Bujnak, Stepan wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 7:49 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
[...]
> > You are trying to allocate from the OOM context. That is a big no no.
> > Not to mention that this is deadlock prone because get_cmdline needs
> > mmap_sem and the allocating context migh hold the lock already. So the
> > patch is simply wrong.
> >
> 
> Thanks for the notes. I understand how allocating from OOM context
> is a problem. However I still believe that this would be helpful
> for debugging OOM kills since task->comm is often not descriptive
> enough. Would it help if instead of calling kstrdup_quotable_cmdline()
> which allocates the buffer on heap I called get_cmdline() directly
> passing it stack-allocated buffer of certain size e.g. 256?

No it wouldn't because get_cmdline take mmap_sem lock as already pointed
out.

Please also note that the cmd line might be considered security/privacy
sensitive information and dumping it to the log sounds like a bad idea
in general.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs


      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-20 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-20  3:22 Stepan Bujnak
2019-02-20  4:09 ` Randy Dunlap
2019-02-20  4:30   ` Bujnak, Stepan
2019-02-20  5:56     ` Randy Dunlap
2019-02-20  6:49 ` Michal Hocko
2019-02-20  8:37   ` Bujnak, Stepan
2019-02-20 10:00     ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-02-20 10:01     ` Michal Hocko [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190220100105.GW4525@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=stepan@pex.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox