From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Roman Gushchin <guroan@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] vmalloc enhancements
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:08:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190211190822.GA14443@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181219173751.28056-1-guro@fb.com>
These slipped through the cracks. +CC Andrew directly.
Andrew, if it's not too late yet, could you consider them for 5.1?
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 09:37:48AM -0800, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> The patchset contains few changes to the vmalloc code, which are
> leading to some performance gains and code simplification.
>
> Also, it exports a number of pages, used by vmalloc(),
> in /proc/meminfo.
>
> Patch (1) removes some redundancy on __vunmap().
> Patch (2) separates memory allocation and data initialization
> in alloc_vmap_area()
> Patch (3) adds vmalloc counter to /proc/meminfo.
>
> RFC->v1:
> - removed bogus empty lines (suggested by Matthew Wilcox)
> - made nr_vmalloc_pages static (suggested by Matthew Wilcox)
> - dropped patch 3 from RFC patchset, will post later with
> some other changes
> - dropped RFC
>
> Roman Gushchin (3):
> mm: refactor __vunmap() to avoid duplicated call to find_vm_area()
> mm: separate memory allocation and actual work in alloc_vmap_area()
> mm: show number of vmalloc pages in /proc/meminfo
>
> fs/proc/meminfo.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/vmalloc.h | 2 +
> mm/vmalloc.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.19.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-11 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-19 17:37 Roman Gushchin
2018-12-19 17:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: refactor __vunmap() to avoid duplicated call to find_vm_area() Roman Gushchin
2018-12-19 17:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: separate memory allocation and actual work in alloc_vmap_area() Roman Gushchin
2018-12-19 17:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: show number of vmalloc pages in /proc/meminfo Roman Gushchin
2019-02-11 19:08 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2019-02-11 19:18 ` [PATCH 0/3] vmalloc enhancements Andrew Morton
2019-02-11 20:46 ` Roman Gushchin
[not found] <20190225203037.1317-1-guro@fb.com>
2019-03-29 22:07 ` Roman Gushchin
2019-04-17 13:36 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190211190822.GA14443@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=guroan@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox