linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: Consider subtrees in memory.events
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:01:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190211190115.GC13953@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190208224419.GA24772@chrisdown.name>

On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 10:44:19PM +0000, Chris Down wrote:
> memory.stat and other files already consider subtrees in their output,
> and we should too in order to not present an inconsistent interface.
> 
> The current situation is fairly confusing, because people interacting
> with cgroups expect hierarchical behaviour in the vein of memory.stat,
> cgroup.events, and other files. For example, this causes confusion when
> debugging reclaim events under low, as currently these always read "0"
> at non-leaf memcg nodes, which frequently causes people to misdiagnose
> breach behaviour. The same confusion applies to other counters in this
> file when debugging issues.
> 
> Aggregation is done at write time instead of at read-time since these
> counters aren't hot (unlike memory.stat which is per-page, so it does it
> at read time), and it makes sense to bundle this with the file
> notifications.
> 
> After this patch, events are propagated up the hierarchy:
> 
>     [root@ktst ~]# cat /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/memory.events
>     low 0
>     high 0
>     max 0
>     oom 0
>     oom_kill 0
>     [root@ktst ~]# systemd-run -p MemoryMax=1 true
>     Running as unit: run-r251162a189fb4562b9dabfdc9b0422f5.service
>     [root@ktst ~]# cat /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/memory.events
>     low 0
>     high 0
>     max 7
>     oom 1
>     oom_kill 1
> 
> As this is a change in behaviour, this can be reverted to the old
> behaviour by mounting with the `memory_localevents` flag set. However,
> we use the new behaviour by default as there's a lack of evidence that
> there are any current users of memory.events that would find this change
> undesirable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
> Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> Cc: kernel-team@fb.com

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>


  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-11 19:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-23 22:31 [PATCH " Chris Down
2019-01-24  0:24 ` Roman Gushchin
2019-01-24  1:03   ` Chris Down
2019-01-24  8:22 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-24 15:21   ` Tejun Heo
2019-01-24 15:51     ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-24 16:00   ` Johannes Weiner
2019-01-24 17:01     ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-24 18:23       ` Johannes Weiner
2019-01-25  8:42         ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-25 16:51           ` Tejun Heo
2019-01-25 17:37             ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-25 17:37               ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-25 18:28               ` Tejun Heo
2019-01-28 12:51                 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-28 14:28                   ` Tejun Heo
2019-01-28 14:52                     ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-28 14:54                       ` Tejun Heo
2019-01-28 15:18                         ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-28 15:41                           ` Tejun Heo
2019-01-28 17:05                             ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-28 17:05                               ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-28 17:49                               ` Tejun Heo
2019-01-28 17:49                                 ` Tejun Heo
2019-01-29 14:43                                 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-29 14:52                                   ` Tejun Heo
2019-01-30 16:50                                     ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-30 17:06                                       ` Tejun Heo
2019-01-30 17:41                                         ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-30 17:52                                           ` Tejun Heo
2019-01-30 18:16                                             ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-30 19:11                                         ` Shakeel Butt
2019-01-30 19:27                                           ` Johannes Weiner
2019-01-30 19:30                                             ` Johannes Weiner
2019-01-30 19:37                                               ` Shakeel Butt
2019-01-30 19:23                   ` Johannes Weiner
2019-01-30 20:05                     ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-30 21:31                       ` Johannes Weiner
2019-01-31  8:58                         ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-31 16:22                           ` Johannes Weiner
2019-02-01 10:27                             ` Michal Hocko
2019-02-01 16:34                               ` Johannes Weiner
2019-01-28 15:59                 ` Shakeel Butt
2019-01-28 15:59                   ` Shakeel Butt
2019-01-28 16:05                   ` Tejun Heo
2019-01-28 16:05                     ` Tejun Heo
2019-01-28 16:08                     ` Shakeel Butt
2019-01-28 16:08                       ` Shakeel Butt
2019-01-28 16:12                       ` Tejun Heo
2019-01-28 16:12                         ` Tejun Heo
2019-01-28 14:30 ` Tejun Heo
2019-02-08 22:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: Rename ambiguously named memory.stat counters and functions Chris Down
2019-02-08 22:44   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: Consider subtrees in memory.events Chris Down
2019-02-11 19:01     ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2019-02-11 18:55   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: Rename ambiguously named memory.stat counters and functions Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190211190115.GC13953@cmpxchg.org \
    --to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chris@chrisdown.name \
    --cc=dennis@kernel.org \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox