From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: jglisse@redhat.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] mm/mmu_notifier: use unsigned for event field in range struct
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 20:13:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190202011340.GD12463@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190131183706.20980-3-jglisse@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 01:37:04PM -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> From: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
>
> Use unsigned for event field in range struct so that we can also set
> flags with the event. This patch change the field and introduce the
> helper.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> include/linux/mmu_notifier.h | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
> index be873c431886..d7a35975c2bd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> #include <linux/mm_types.h>
> #include <linux/srcu.h>
> +#include <linux/log2.h>
>
> struct mmu_notifier;
> struct mmu_notifier_ops;
> @@ -38,8 +39,11 @@ enum mmu_notifier_event {
> MMU_NOTIFY_PROTECTION_VMA,
> MMU_NOTIFY_PROTECTION_PAGE,
> MMU_NOTIFY_SOFT_DIRTY,
> + MMU_NOTIFY_EVENT_MAX
> };
>
> +#define MMU_NOTIFIER_EVENT_BITS order_base_2(MMU_NOTIFY_EVENT_MAX)
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER
>
> /*
> @@ -60,7 +64,7 @@ struct mmu_notifier_range {
> struct mm_struct *mm;
> unsigned long start;
> unsigned long end;
> - enum mmu_notifier_event event;
> + unsigned event;
> bool blockable;
> };
This is only allocated in the stack, so saving RAM by mixing bitfields
with enum in the same 4 bytes to save 4 bytes isn't of maximum
priority.
A possibly cleaner way to save those 4 bytes without mixing enum with
bitfields by hand, is to add a "unsigned short flags" which will make
"event/flags/blockable" fit in the same 8 bytes (bool only needs 1
byte) as before the patch (the first bitfield can start from 0 then).
Yet another way is to drop blockable and convert it to a flag in
"unsigned int flags".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-02 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-31 18:37 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Restore change_pte optimization to its former glory jglisse
2019-01-31 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] uprobes: use set_pte_at() not set_pte_at_notify() jglisse
2019-02-02 0:50 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-02-11 19:27 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-31 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] mm/mmu_notifier: use unsigned for event field in range struct jglisse
2019-02-02 1:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2019-01-31 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] mm/mmu_notifier: set MMU_NOTIFIER_USE_CHANGE_PTE flag where appropriate jglisse
2019-01-31 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] kvm/mmu_notifier: re-enable the change_pte() optimization jglisse
2019-02-01 23:57 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] Restore change_pte optimization to its former glory Andrea Arcangeli
2019-02-02 0:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-02-11 19:09 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-11 20:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-02-18 16:04 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-18 17:45 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-02-18 18:20 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-19 2:37 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-19 2:43 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-19 3:33 ` Jerome Glisse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190202011340.GD12463@redhat.com \
--to=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox