From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
To: jglisse@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: "Ralph Campbell" <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
"Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Matthew Wilcox" <mawilcox@microsoft.com>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, "John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
"Felix Kuehling" <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@kernel.org>,
"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@mellanox.com>,
"Ross Zwisler" <zwisler@kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/9] gpu/drm/i915: optimize out the case when a range is updated to read only
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 14:09:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <154833175216.4120.925061299171157938@jlahtine-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190124120912.-8w9k7zqxBo5qCD254ZSc8qQzFCadvEXmKdeQtfLl9c@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190123222315.1122-9-jglisse@redhat.com>
Hi Jerome,
This patch seems to have plenty of Cc:s, but none of the right ones :)
For further iterations, I guess you could use git option --cc to make
sure everyone gets the whole series, and still keep the Cc:s in the
patches themselves relevant to subsystems.
This doesn't seem to be on top of drm-tip, but on top of your previous
patches(?) that I had some comments about. Could you take a moment to
first address the couple of question I had, before proceeding to discuss
what is built on top of that base.
My reply's Message-ID is:
154289518994.19402.3481838548028068213@jlahtine-desk.ger.corp.intel.com
Regards, Joonas
PS. Please keep me Cc:d in the following patches, I'm keen on
understanding the motive and benefits.
Quoting jglisse@redhat.com (2019-01-24 00:23:14)
> From: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
>
> When range of virtual address is updated read only and corresponding
> user ptr object are already read only it is pointless to do anything.
> Optimize this case out.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Cc: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
> Cc: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@kernel.org>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
> Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
> index 9558582c105e..23330ac3d7ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ struct i915_mmu_object {
> struct interval_tree_node it;
> struct list_head link;
> struct work_struct work;
> + bool read_only;
> bool attached;
> };
>
> @@ -119,6 +120,7 @@ static int i915_gem_userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *_mn,
> container_of(_mn, struct i915_mmu_notifier, mn);
> struct i915_mmu_object *mo;
> struct interval_tree_node *it;
> + bool update_to_read_only;
> LIST_HEAD(cancelled);
> unsigned long end;
>
> @@ -128,6 +130,8 @@ static int i915_gem_userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *_mn,
> /* interval ranges are inclusive, but invalidate range is exclusive */
> end = range->end - 1;
>
> + update_to_read_only = mmu_notifier_range_update_to_read_only(range);
> +
> spin_lock(&mn->lock);
> it = interval_tree_iter_first(&mn->objects, range->start, end);
> while (it) {
> @@ -145,6 +149,17 @@ static int i915_gem_userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *_mn,
> * object if it is not in the process of being destroyed.
> */
> mo = container_of(it, struct i915_mmu_object, it);
> +
> + /*
> + * If it is already read only and we are updating to
> + * read only then we do not need to change anything.
> + * So save time and skip this one.
> + */
> + if (update_to_read_only && mo->read_only) {
> + it = interval_tree_iter_next(it, range->start, end);
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> if (kref_get_unless_zero(&mo->obj->base.refcount))
> queue_work(mn->wq, &mo->work);
>
> @@ -270,6 +285,7 @@ i915_gem_userptr_init__mmu_notifier(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> mo->mn = mn;
> mo->obj = obj;
> mo->it.start = obj->userptr.ptr;
> + mo->read_only = i915_gem_object_is_readonly(obj);
> mo->it.last = obj->userptr.ptr + obj->base.size - 1;
> INIT_WORK(&mo->work, cancel_userptr);
>
> --
> 2.17.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-24 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-23 22:23 [PATCH v4 0/9] mmu notifier provide context informations jglisse
2019-01-23 22:23 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] mm/mmu_notifier: contextual information for event enums jglisse
2019-01-23 22:23 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] mm/mmu_notifier: contextual information for event triggering invalidation jglisse
2019-01-23 22:23 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] mm/mmu_notifier: use correct mmu_notifier events for each invalidation jglisse
2019-01-23 22:23 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] mm/mmu_notifier: pass down vma and reasons why mmu notifier is happening jglisse
2019-01-23 22:23 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] mm/mmu_notifier: mmu_notifier_range_update_to_read_only() helper jglisse
2019-01-23 22:23 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] gpu/drm/radeon: optimize out the case when a range is updated to read only jglisse
2019-01-23 22:23 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] gpu/drm/amdgpu: " jglisse
2019-01-23 22:23 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] gpu/drm/i915: " jglisse
2019-01-24 12:09 ` Joonas Lahtinen [this message]
2019-01-24 12:09 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2019-01-24 15:30 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-29 14:20 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2019-01-29 16:21 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-23 22:23 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] RDMA/umem_odp: " jglisse
2019-01-23 22:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-23 22:46 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-23 22:54 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] mmu notifier provide context informations Dan Williams
2019-01-23 23:04 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-24 0:00 ` Dan Williams
2019-01-31 16:10 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-31 19:55 ` Andrew Morton
2019-01-31 20:33 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-01 12:24 ` Christian König
2019-02-01 21:02 ` Jan Kara
2019-02-11 18:54 ` Jerome Glisse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=154833175216.4120.925061299171157938@jlahtine-desk.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mawilcox@microsoft.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=zwisler@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox