From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg1-f198.google.com (mail-pg1-f198.google.com [209.85.215.198]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EAE78E0047 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 03:13:10 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pg1-f198.google.com with SMTP id q62so3429981pgq.9 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 00:13:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org. [198.145.29.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m32si4853762pld.86.2019.01.24.00.13.09 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 24 Jan 2019 00:13:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 09:13:06 +0100 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mm, oom: fix use-after-free in oom_kill_process Message-ID: <20190124081306.GA1344@kroah.com> References: <20190123225747.8715120856@mail.kernel.org> <201901232335.x0NNZRWw042364@www262.sakura.ne.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201901232335.x0NNZRWw042364@www262.sakura.ne.jp> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Tetsuo Handa Cc: Shakeel Butt , Sasha Levin , Johannes Weiner , Linux MM , LKML , Andrew Morton , David Rientjes , stable@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 08:35:27AM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Shakeel Butt wrote: > > > How should we proceed with this patch? > > > > > > > We do want to backport this patch to stable kernels. However shouldn't > > we wait for this patch to be applied to Linus's tree first. Yes we will. > But since Andrew Morton seems to be offline since Jan 11, we don't know > when this patch will arrive at Linus's tree. That's fine, we can wait :) greg k-h