From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io1-f69.google.com (mail-io1-f69.google.com [209.85.166.69]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062EF8E0047 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:35:41 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-io1-f69.google.com with SMTP id p21so3189206iog.0 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:35:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from www262.sakura.ne.jp (www262.sakura.ne.jp. [202.181.97.72]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m189si687613ita.78.2019.01.23.15.35.39 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:35:39 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <201901232335.x0NNZRWw042364@www262.sakura.ne.jp> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mm, oom: fix use-after-free in =?ISO-2022-JP?B?b29tX2tpbGxfcHJvY2Vzcw==?= From: Tetsuo Handa MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 08:35:27 +0900 References: <20190123225747.8715120856@mail.kernel.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Shakeel Butt Cc: Sasha Levin , Johannes Weiner , Linux MM , LKML , Andrew Morton , David Rientjes , stable@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds Shakeel Butt wrote: > > How should we proceed with this patch? > > > > We do want to backport this patch to stable kernels. However shouldn't > we wait for this patch to be applied to Linus's tree first. > But since Andrew Morton seems to be offline since Jan 11, we don't know when this patch will arrive at Linus's tree.