From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: schedule high reclaim for remote memcgs on high_work
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 15:59:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190108145942.GZ31793@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190103015638.205424-1-shakeelb@google.com>
On Wed 02-01-19 17:56:38, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> If a memcg is over high limit, memory reclaim is scheduled to run on
> return-to-userland. However it is assumed that the memcg is the current
> process's memcg. With remote memcg charging for kmem or swapping in a
> page charged to remote memcg, current process can trigger reclaim on
> remote memcg. So, schduling reclaim on return-to-userland for remote
> memcgs will ignore the high reclaim altogether. So, punt the high
> reclaim of remote memcgs to high_work.
Have you seen this happening in real life workloads? And is this
offloading what we really want to do? I mean it is clearly the current
task that has triggered the remote charge so why should we offload that
work to a system? Is there any reason we cannot reclaim on the remote
memcg from the return-to-userland path?
> Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index e9db1160ccbc..47439c84667a 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2302,19 +2302,23 @@ static int try_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> * reclaim on returning to userland. We can perform reclaim here
> * if __GFP_RECLAIM but let's always punt for simplicity and so that
> * GFP_KERNEL can consistently be used during reclaim. @memcg is
> - * not recorded as it most likely matches current's and won't
> - * change in the meantime. As high limit is checked again before
> - * reclaim, the cost of mismatch is negligible.
> + * not recorded as the return-to-userland high reclaim will only reclaim
> + * from current's memcg (or its ancestor). For other memcgs we punt them
> + * to work queue.
> */
> do {
> if (page_counter_read(&memcg->memory) > memcg->high) {
> - /* Don't bother a random interrupted task */
> - if (in_interrupt()) {
> + /*
> + * Don't bother a random interrupted task or if the
> + * memcg is not current's memcg's ancestor.
> + */
> + if (in_interrupt() ||
> + !mm_match_cgroup(current->mm, memcg)) {
> schedule_work(&memcg->high_work);
> - break;
> + } else {
> + current->memcg_nr_pages_over_high += batch;
> + set_notify_resume(current);
> }
> - current->memcg_nr_pages_over_high += batch;
> - set_notify_resume(current);
> break;
> }
> } while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg)));
> --
> 2.20.1.415.g653613c723-goog
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-08 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-03 1:56 Shakeel Butt
2019-01-03 1:56 ` Shakeel Butt
2019-01-08 14:59 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2019-01-08 17:24 ` Shakeel Butt
2019-01-08 17:24 ` Shakeel Butt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190108145942.GZ31793@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox