From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] oom, memcg: do not report racy no-eligible OOM
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 15:38:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190107143802.16847-1-mhocko@kernel.org> (raw)
Hi,
I have posted this as an RFC previously [1]. Tetsuo has pointed out some
issues with the patch 1 which I have fixed hopefully. Other than that
this is just a rebase on top of Linus tree.
The original cover:
this is a follow up for [2] which has been nacked mostly because Tetsuo
was able to find a simple workload which can trigger a race where
no-eligible task is reported without a good reason. I believe the patch2
addresses that issue and we do not have to play dirty games with
throttling just because of the race. I still believe that patch proposed
in [2] is a useful one but this can be addressed later.
This series comprises 2 patch. The first one is something I meant to do
loooong time ago, I just never have time to do that. We need it here to
handle CLONE_VM without CLONE_SIGHAND cases. The second patch closes the
race.
Feedback is appreciated of course.
[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181022071323.9550-1-mhocko@kernel.org
[2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181010151135.25766-1-mhocko@kernel.org
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] oom, memcg: do not report racy no-eligible OOM
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 15:38:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190107143802.16847-1-mhocko@kernel.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190107143800.YDuTjGaFjvNfcK9JoYS5gkj6y9hdaXDMSYdOTJJj5LM@z> (raw)
Hi,
I have posted this as an RFC previously [1]. Tetsuo has pointed out some
issues with the patch 1 which I have fixed hopefully. Other than that
this is just a rebase on top of Linus tree.
The original cover:
this is a follow up for [2] which has been nacked mostly because Tetsuo
was able to find a simple workload which can trigger a race where
no-eligible task is reported without a good reason. I believe the patch2
addresses that issue and we do not have to play dirty games with
throttling just because of the race. I still believe that patch proposed
in [2] is a useful one but this can be addressed later.
This series comprises 2 patch. The first one is something I meant to do
loooong time ago, I just never have time to do that. We need it here to
handle CLONE_VM without CLONE_SIGHAND cases. The second patch closes the
race.
Feedback is appreciated of course.
[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181022071323.9550-1-mhocko@kernel.org
[2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181010151135.25766-1-mhocko@kernel.org
next reply other threads:[~2019-01-07 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-07 14:38 Michal Hocko [this message]
2019-01-07 14:38 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-07 14:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm, oom: marks all killed tasks as oom victims Michal Hocko
2019-01-07 14:38 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-07 20:58 ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-01-08 8:11 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-07 14:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] memcg: do not report racy no-eligible OOM tasks Michal Hocko
2019-01-07 14:38 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-07 20:59 ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-01-08 8:14 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-08 10:39 ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-01-08 11:46 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-08 8:35 ` kbuild test robot
2019-01-08 9:39 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-11 0:23 ` [kbuild-all] " Rong Chen
2019-01-08 14:21 ` [PATCH 3/2] memcg: Facilitate termination of memcg OOM victims Tetsuo Handa
2019-01-08 14:38 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-09 11:03 ` [PATCH 0/2] oom, memcg: do not report racy no-eligible OOM Michal Hocko
2019-01-09 11:34 ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-01-09 12:02 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-10 23:59 ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-01-11 10:25 ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-01-11 11:33 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-11 12:40 ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-01-11 13:34 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-11 14:31 ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-01-11 15:07 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-11 15:37 ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-01-11 16:45 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-12 10:52 ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-01-13 17:36 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190107143802.16847-1-mhocko@kernel.org \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox