Re: [PATCH] mm: Expose lazy vfree pages to control via sysctl

[Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>]

On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 09:05:41PM +0530, Ashish Mhetre wrote:
> From: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@nvidia.com>
> 
> The purpose of lazy_max_pages is to gather virtual address space till it
> reaches the lazy_max_pages limit and then purge with a TLB flush and hence
> reduce the number of global TLB flushes.
> The default value of lazy_max_pages with one CPU is 32MB and with 4 CPUs it
> is 96MB i.e. for 4 cores, 96MB of vmalloc space will be gathered before it
> is purged with a TLB flush.
> This feature has shown random latency issues. For example, we have seen
> that the kernel thread for some camera application spent 30ms in
> __purge_vmap_area_lazy() with 4 CPUs.

You're not the first to report something like this.  Looking through the
kernel logs, I see:

commit 763b218ddfaf56761c19923beb7e16656f66ec62
Author: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Date:   Mon Dec 12 16:44:26 2016 -0800

    mm: add preempt points into __purge_vmap_area_lazy()

commit f9e09977671b618aeb25ddc0d4c9a84d5b5cde9d
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date:   Mon Dec 12 16:44:23 2016 -0800

    mm: turn vmap_purge_lock into a mutex

commit 80c4bd7a5e4368b680e0aeb57050a1b06eb573d8
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Fri May 20 16:57:38 2016 -0700

    mm/vmalloc: keep a separate lazy-free list

So the first thing I want to do is to confirm that you see this problem
on a modern kernel.  We've had trouble with NVidia before reporting
historical problems as if they were new.