From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Paul Lawrence <paullawrence@google.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>,
Lee Smith <Lee.Smith@arm.com>,
Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com>,
Jacob Bramley <Jacob.Bramley@arm.com>,
Ruben Ayrapetyan <Ruben.Ayrapetyan@arm.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Mark Brand <markbrand@google.com>,
Chintan Pandya <cpandya@codeaurora.org>,
Vishwath Mohan <vishwath@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] kasan, arm64: use ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN instead of manual aligning
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 15:52:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190103155230.GA10070@edgewater-inn.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190102121436.5c2b72d1b0ec49affadc9692@linux-foundation.org>
On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 12:14:36PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 18:36:06 +0100 Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> wrote:
>
> > Instead of changing cache->align to be aligned to KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SIZE
> > in kasan_cache_create() we can reuse the ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN macro.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kasan.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kasan.h
> > @@ -36,6 +36,10 @@
> > #define KASAN_SHADOW_OFFSET (KASAN_SHADOW_END - (1ULL << \
> > (64 - KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SHIFT)))
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS
> > +#define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN (1ULL << KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SHIFT)
> > +#endif
> > +
> > void kasan_init(void);
> > void kasan_copy_shadow(pgd_t *pgdir);
> > asmlinkage void kasan_early_init(void);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
> > index 11b45f7ae405..d87f913ab4e8 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/slab.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/slab.h
> > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> > #include <linux/overflow.h>
> > #include <linux/types.h>
> > #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> > +#include <linux/kasan.h>
> >
>
> This still seems unadvisable. Like other architectures, arm defines
> ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN in arch/arm/include/asm/cache.h.
> arch/arm/include/asm64/cache.h doesn't define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN
> afaict.
>
> If arch/arm/include/asm64/cache.h later gets a definition of
> ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN then we again face the risk that different .c files
> will see different values of ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN depending on which
> headers they include.
>
> So what to say about this? The architecture's ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN
> should be defined in the architecture's cache.h, end of story. Not in
> slab.h, not in kasan.h.
Agreed. Also, as far as I can tell, this patch isn't actually a fix (unlike
the other two in this series) so it should be harmless to drop it for now.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-03 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-02 17:36 [PATCH v2 0/3] kasan: tag-based mode fixes Andrey Konovalov
2019-01-02 17:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] kasan, arm64: use ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN instead of manual aligning Andrey Konovalov
2019-01-02 20:14 ` Andrew Morton
2019-01-03 15:52 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2019-01-03 18:46 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-01-03 18:46 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-01-02 17:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] kasan: make tag based mode work with CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY Andrey Konovalov
2019-01-02 17:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] kasan: fix krealloc handling for tag-based mode Andrey Konovalov
2019-01-02 22:14 ` kbuild test robot
2019-01-02 22:14 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190103155230.GA10070@edgewater-inn.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=Jacob.Bramley@arm.com \
--cc=Lee.Smith@arm.com \
--cc=Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com \
--cc=Ruben.Ayrapetyan@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=cpandya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=eugenis@google.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kcc@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=markbrand@google.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=paullawrence@google.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=vishwath@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox