From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org,
rientjes@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kmemleak: survive in a low-memory situation
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 16:59:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190102165931.GB6584@arrakis.emea.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190102160849.11480-1-cai@lca.pw>
Hi Qian,
On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 11:08:49AM -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
> Kmemleak could quickly fail to allocate an object structure and then
> disable itself in a low-memory situation. For example, running a mmap()
> workload triggering swapping and OOM [1].
>
> First, it unnecessarily attempt to allocate even though the tracking
> object is NULL in kmem_cache_alloc(). For example,
>
> alloc_io
> bio_alloc_bioset
> mempool_alloc
> mempool_alloc_slab
> kmem_cache_alloc
> slab_alloc_node
> __slab_alloc <-- could return NULL
> slab_post_alloc_hook
> kmemleak_alloc_recursive
kmemleak_alloc() only continues with the kmemleak_object allocation if
the given pointer is not NULL.
> diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
> index 4190c24ef0e9..51a9a942cc56 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.h
> +++ b/mm/slab.h
> @@ -435,15 +435,16 @@ static inline void slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags,
> {
> size_t i;
>
> - flags &= gfp_allowed_mask;
> - for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> - void *object = p[i];
> -
> - kmemleak_alloc_recursive(object, s->object_size, 1,
> - s->flags, flags);
> - p[i] = kasan_slab_alloc(s, object, flags);
> + if (*p) {
> + flags &= gfp_allowed_mask;
> + for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> + void *object = p[i];
> +
> + kmemleak_alloc_recursive(object, s->object_size, 1,
> + s->flags, flags);
> + p[i] = kasan_slab_alloc(s, object, flags);
> + }
> }
This is not necessary for kmemleak.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-02 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-30 5:25 kmemleak not play well with low memory situation Qian Cai
2019-01-02 16:08 ` [PATCH] kmemleak: survive in a low-memory situation Qian Cai
2019-01-02 16:59 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2019-01-02 18:06 ` [PATCH v2] " Qian Cai
2019-01-03 9:32 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-03 16:51 ` Qian Cai
2019-01-03 17:07 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-07 10:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-01-08 2:06 ` Qian Cai
2019-01-08 3:49 ` Qian Cai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190102165931.GB6584@arrakis.emea.arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox