From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <owner-linux-mm@kvack.org>
Received: from mail-pf1-f199.google.com (mail-pf1-f199.google.com [209.85.210.199])
	by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137148E0001
	for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 22:04:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail-pf1-f199.google.com with SMTP id s71so22155979pfi.22
        for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 19:04:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org. [140.211.169.12])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 73si28730168pfm.50.2018.12.27.19.04.57
        for <linux-mm@kvack.org>
        (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Thu, 27 Dec 2018 19:04:58 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 19:04:56 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mmotm] efi: drop kmemleak_ignore() for page allocator
Message-Id: <20181227190456.0f21d511ef71f1b455403f2a@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu_e=NkKZ5C+KzBmgg2VMXNKPqXcPON8heRd0F_iW+aaEQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20181226023534.64048-1-cai@lca.pw>
	<CAKv+Gu_fiEDffKq_fONBYTOdSk-L7__+LgNEyVaNF3FGzBfAow@mail.gmail.com>
	<403405f1-b702-2feb-4616-35fc3dc3133e@lca.pw>
	<CAKv+Gu_e=NkKZ5C+KzBmgg2VMXNKPqXcPON8heRd0F_iW+aaEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
List-ID: <linux-mm.kvack.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 16:31:59 +0100 Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote:

> Please stop sending EFI patches if you can't be bothered to
> test/reproduce against the EFI tree.

um, sorry, but that's a bit strong.  Finding (let alone fixing) a bug
in EFI is a great contribution (thanks!) and the EFI maintainers are
perfectly capable of reviewing and testing the proposed fix.  Or of
fixing the bug by other means.

Let's not beat people up for helping us in a less-than-perfect way, no?