Re: [PATCH] mm: do not report isolation failures for CMA pages

[Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>]

On Tue 18-12-18 11:18:35, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 10:28:02AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> > 
> > Heiko has complained that his log is swamped by warnings from has_unmovable_pages
> > [   20.536664] page dumped because: has_unmovable_pages
> > [   20.536792] page:000003d081ff4080 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:000000008ff88600 index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0
> > [   20.536794] flags: 0x3fffe0000010200(slab|head)
> > [   20.536795] raw: 03fffe0000010200 0000000000000100 0000000000000200 000000008ff88600
> > [   20.536796] raw: 0000000000000000 0020004100000000 ffffffff00000001 0000000000000000
> > [   20.536797] page dumped because: has_unmovable_pages
> > [   20.536814] page:000003d0823b0000 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0
> > [   20.536815] flags: 0x7fffe0000000000()
> > [   20.536817] raw: 07fffe0000000000 0000000000000100 0000000000000200 0000000000000000
> > [   20.536818] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff00000001 0000000000000000
> > 
> > which are not triggered by the memory hotplug but rather CMA allocator.
> > The original idea behind dumping the page state for all call paths was
> > that these messages will be helpful debugging failures. From the above
> > it seems that this is not the case for the CMA path because we are
> > lacking much more context. E.g the second reported page might be a CMA
> > allocated page. It is still interesting to see a slab page in the CMA
> > area but it is hard to tell whether this is bug from the above output
> > alone.
> > 
> > Address this issue by dumping the page state only on request. Both
> > start_isolate_page_range and has_unmovable_pages already have an
> > argument to ignore hwpoison pages so make this argument more generic and
> > turn it into flags and allow callers to combine non-default modes into a
> > mask. While we are at it, has_unmovable_pages call from is_pageblock_removable_nolock
> > (sysfs removable file) is questionable to report the failure so drop it
> > from there as well.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> 
> Looks good to me, and it makes sense to not spam other users.
> 
> Just one thing:
> 
> AFAICS alloc_contig_range() can also be called from hugetlb code.
> Do we weant to specify that in the changelog too?
> And possibly change the patch title to:

Well, I haven't seen any reports about hugetlb pages so I didn't bother
to mention it. Is this really important to note?

> "Only report isolation failures from memhotplug code" ?

only report isolation failures when offlining memory

> Although is_pageblock_removable_nolock will not report the failures
> now, so I am not sure.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>

Thanks!
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs