From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl1-f200.google.com (mail-pl1-f200.google.com [209.85.214.200]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A35868E0001 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 05:46:30 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pl1-f200.google.com with SMTP id a9so11632263pla.2 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 02:46:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org. [198.137.202.133]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q15si13016959pgm.420.2018.12.18.02.46.29 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 18 Dec 2018 02:46:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:46:22 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] psi: introduce psi monitor Message-ID: <20181218104622.GB15430@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20181214171508.7791-1-surenb@google.com> <20181214171508.7791-7-surenb@google.com> <20181217162223.GD2218@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Suren Baghdasaryan Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Tejun Heo , lizefan@huawei.com, Johannes Weiner , axboe@kernel.dk, dennis@kernel.org, Dennis Zhou , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Jonathan Corbet , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, LKML , kernel-team@android.com On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 05:21:05PM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 8:22 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > How well has this thing been fuzzed? Custom string parser, yay! > > Honestly, not much. Normal cases and some obvious corner cases. Will > check if I can use some fuzzer to get more coverage or will write a > script. > I'm not thrilled about writing a custom parser, so if there is a > better way to handle this please advise. The grammar seems fairly simple, something like: some-full = "some" | "full" ; threshold-abs = integer ; threshold-pct = integer, { "%" } ; threshold = threshold-abs | threshold-pct ; window = integer ; trigger = some-full, space, threshold, space, window ; And that could even be expressed as two scanf formats: "%4s %u%% %u" , "%4s %u %u" which then gets your something like: char type[5]; if (sscanf(input, "%4s %u%% %u", &type, &pct, &window) == 3) { // do pct thing } else if (sscanf(intput, "%4s %u %u", &type, &thres, &window) == 3) { // do abs thing } else return -EFAIL; if (!strcmp(type, "some")) { // some } else if (!strcmp(type, "full")) { // full } else return -EFAIL; // do more which seems like a lot less error prone. Alternatively you can use 4 formats: "some %u%% %u" "some %u %u" "full %u%% %u" "full %u %u" and avoid the whole 'type' thing.