Re: [PATCH] mm: do not report isolation failures for CMA pages

[Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>]

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 10:28:02AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> 
> Heiko has complained that his log is swamped by warnings from has_unmovable_pages
> [   20.536664] page dumped because: has_unmovable_pages
> [   20.536792] page:000003d081ff4080 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:000000008ff88600 index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0
> [   20.536794] flags: 0x3fffe0000010200(slab|head)
> [   20.536795] raw: 03fffe0000010200 0000000000000100 0000000000000200 000000008ff88600
> [   20.536796] raw: 0000000000000000 0020004100000000 ffffffff00000001 0000000000000000
> [   20.536797] page dumped because: has_unmovable_pages
> [   20.536814] page:000003d0823b0000 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0
> [   20.536815] flags: 0x7fffe0000000000()
> [   20.536817] raw: 07fffe0000000000 0000000000000100 0000000000000200 0000000000000000
> [   20.536818] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff00000001 0000000000000000
> 
> which are not triggered by the memory hotplug but rather CMA allocator.
> The original idea behind dumping the page state for all call paths was
> that these messages will be helpful debugging failures. From the above
> it seems that this is not the case for the CMA path because we are
> lacking much more context. E.g the second reported page might be a CMA
> allocated page. It is still interesting to see a slab page in the CMA
> area but it is hard to tell whether this is bug from the above output
> alone.
> 
> Address this issue by dumping the page state only on request. Both
> start_isolate_page_range and has_unmovable_pages already have an
> argument to ignore hwpoison pages so make this argument more generic and
> turn it into flags and allow callers to combine non-default modes into a
> mask. While we are at it, has_unmovable_pages call from is_pageblock_removable_nolock
> (sysfs removable file) is questionable to report the failure so drop it
> from there as well.
> 
> Reported-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

Looks good to me, and it makes sense to not spam other users.

Just one thing:

AFAICS alloc_contig_range() can also be called from hugetlb code.
Do we weant to specify that in the changelog too?
And possibly change the patch title to:

"Only report isolation failures from memhotplug code" ?

Although is_pageblock_removable_nolock will not report the failures
now, so I am not sure.

Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>

-- 
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3