From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Cc: phillip@squashfs.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] squashfs: enable __GFP_FS in ->readpage to prevent hang in mem alloc
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 06:38:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181215143824.GJ10600@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181204020840.49576-1-houtao1@huawei.com>
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 10:08:40AM +0800, Hou Tao wrote:
> There is no need to disable __GFP_FS in ->readpage:
> * It's a read-only fs, so there will be no dirty/writeback page and
> there will be no deadlock against the caller's locked page
> * It just allocates one page, so compaction will not be invoked
> * It doesn't take any inode lock, so the reclamation of inode will be fine
>
> And no __GFP_FS may lead to hang in __alloc_pages_slowpath() if a
> squashfs page fault occurs in the context of a memory hogger, because
> the hogger will not be killed due to the logic in __alloc_pages_may_oom().
I don't understand your argument here. There's a comment in
__alloc_pages_may_oom() saying that we _should_ treat GFP_NOFS
specially, but we currently don't.
/*
* XXX: GFP_NOFS allocations should rather fail than rely on
* other request to make a forward progress.
* We are in an unfortunate situation where out_of_memory cannot
* do much for this context but let's try it to at least get
* access to memory reserved if the current task is killed (see
* out_of_memory). Once filesystems are ready to handle allocation
* failures more gracefully we should just bail out here.
*/
What problem are you actually seeing?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-15 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-04 2:08 Hou Tao
2018-12-06 1:14 ` Hou Tao
2018-12-13 2:18 ` Hou Tao
2018-12-15 13:24 ` Hou Tao
2018-12-15 14:38 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2018-12-16 9:38 ` Hou Tao
2018-12-17 3:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-12-17 9:33 ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-17 10:51 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-12-17 12:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-12-17 14:10 ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-17 14:41 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-12-17 14:49 ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-18 6:06 ` Hou Tao
2018-12-18 11:32 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181215143824.GJ10600@bombadil.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=phillip@squashfs.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox