linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Cc: phillip@squashfs.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] squashfs: enable __GFP_FS in ->readpage to prevent hang in mem alloc
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 06:38:24 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181215143824.GJ10600@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181204020840.49576-1-houtao1@huawei.com>

On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 10:08:40AM +0800, Hou Tao wrote:
> There is no need to disable __GFP_FS in ->readpage:
> * It's a read-only fs, so there will be no dirty/writeback page and
>   there will be no deadlock against the caller's locked page
> * It just allocates one page, so compaction will not be invoked
> * It doesn't take any inode lock, so the reclamation of inode will be fine
> 
> And no __GFP_FS may lead to hang in __alloc_pages_slowpath() if a
> squashfs page fault occurs in the context of a memory hogger, because
> the hogger will not be killed due to the logic in __alloc_pages_may_oom().

I don't understand your argument here.  There's a comment in
__alloc_pages_may_oom() saying that we _should_ treat GFP_NOFS
specially, but we currently don't.

        /*
         * XXX: GFP_NOFS allocations should rather fail than rely on
         * other request to make a forward progress.
         * We are in an unfortunate situation where out_of_memory cannot
         * do much for this context but let's try it to at least get
         * access to memory reserved if the current task is killed (see
         * out_of_memory). Once filesystems are ready to handle allocation
         * failures more gracefully we should just bail out here.
         */

What problem are you actually seeing?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-12-15 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-04  2:08 Hou Tao
2018-12-06  1:14 ` Hou Tao
2018-12-13  2:18   ` Hou Tao
2018-12-15 13:24     ` Hou Tao
2018-12-15 14:38 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2018-12-16  9:38   ` Hou Tao
2018-12-17  3:51     ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-12-17  9:33       ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-17 10:51         ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-12-17 12:25           ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-12-17 14:10             ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-17 14:41               ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-12-17 14:49                 ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-18  6:06           ` Hou Tao
2018-12-18 11:32             ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181215143824.GJ10600@bombadil.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=phillip@squashfs.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox