linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Roman Gushchin <guroan@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
	Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] mm: refactor __vunmap() to avoid duplicated call to find_vm_area()
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 10:24:52 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181214182452.GD10600@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181214180720.32040-2-guro@fb.com>

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 10:07:17AM -0800, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> __vunmap() calls find_vm_area() twice without an obvious reason:
> first directly to get the area pointer, second indirectly by calling
> remove_vm_area(), which is again searching for the area.
> 
> To remove this redundancy, let's split remove_vm_area() into
> __remove_vm_area(struct vmap_area *), which performs the actual area
> removal, and remove_vm_area(const void *addr) wrapper, which can
> be used everywhere, where it has been used before.
> 
> On my test setup, I've got up to 12% speed up on vfree()'ing 1000000
> of 4-pages vmalloc blocks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>

Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-14 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-14 18:07 [RFC 0/4] vmalloc enhancements Roman Gushchin
2018-12-14 18:07 ` [RFC 1/4] mm: refactor __vunmap() to avoid duplicated call to find_vm_area() Roman Gushchin
2018-12-14 18:24   ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2018-12-14 18:07 ` [RFC 2/4] mm: separate memory allocation and actual work in alloc_vmap_area() Roman Gushchin
2018-12-14 18:13   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-12-14 19:40     ` Joe Perches
2018-12-14 19:45       ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-12-14 21:57         ` Roman Gushchin
2018-12-15  2:22         ` Joe Perches
2018-12-14 18:07 ` [RFC 3/4] mm: allocate vmalloc metadata in one allocation Roman Gushchin
2018-12-14 18:07 ` [RFC 4/4] mm: show number of vmalloc pages in /proc/meminfo Roman Gushchin
2018-12-14 18:29   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-12-14 18:42     ` Roman Gushchin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181214182452.GD10600@bombadil.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=guroan@gmail.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox