From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ed1-f69.google.com (mail-ed1-f69.google.com [209.85.208.69]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7126B8E0161 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 02:28:31 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-ed1-f69.google.com with SMTP id w2so730434edc.13 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 23:28:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-sor-f65.google.com (mail-sor-f65.google.com. [209.85.220.65]) by mx.google.com with SMTPS id z6-v6sor349386ejq.44.2018.12.12.23.28.30 for (Google Transport Security); Wed, 12 Dec 2018 23:28:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 07:28:28 +0000 From: Wei Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm, pageblock: make sure pageblock won't exceed mem_sectioin Message-ID: <20181213072828.zzfl3guhtc3mbdfa@master> Reply-To: Wei Yang References: <20181205091905.27727-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com> <201812080950.q5whdIbk%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <20181209120323.lotz4v2ahywtk3hk@master> <20181213030832.whutggpzdy336u6y@master> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Rong Chen Cc: Wei Yang , kbuild test robot , kbuild-all@01.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 01:02:21PM +0800, Rong Chen wrote: > > >On 12/13/2018 11:08 AM, Wei Yang wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 10:26:41AM +0800, Rong Chen wrote: >> > >> > On 12/09/2018 08:03 PM, Wei Yang wrote: >> > > On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 09:42:29AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: >> > > > Hi Wei, >> > > > >> > > > Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: >> > > > >> > > > [auto build test WARNING on linus/master] >> > > > [also build test WARNING on v4.20-rc5 next-20181207] >> > > > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] >> > > > >> > > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Wei-Yang/mm-pageblock-make-sure-pageblock-won-t-exceed-mem_sectioin/20181207-030601 >> > > > config: powerpc-allmodconfig (attached as .config) >> > > > compiler: powerpc64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 7.2.0-11) 7.2.0 >> > > > reproduce: >> > > > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross >> > > > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross >> > > > # save the attached .config to linux build tree >> > > > GCC_VERSION=7.2.0 make.cross ARCH=powerpc >> > > > >> > > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> > > > >> > > > In file included from include/linux/gfp.h:6:0, >> > > > from include/linux/xarray.h:14, >> > > > from include/linux/radix-tree.h:31, >> > > > from include/linux/fs.h:15, >> > > > from include/linux/compat.h:17, >> > > > from arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c:16: >> > > > > > include/linux/mmzone.h:1088:6: warning: "pageblock_order" is not defined, evaluates to 0 [-Wundef] >> > > > #if (pageblock_order + PAGE_SHIFT) > SECTION_SIZE_BITS >> > > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> > > > -- >> > > > In file included from include/linux/gfp.h:6:0, >> > > > from include/linux/mm.h:10, >> > > > from mm//swap.c:16: >> > > > > > include/linux/mmzone.h:1088:6: warning: "pageblock_order" is not defined, evaluates to 0 [-Wundef] >> > > > #if (pageblock_order + PAGE_SHIFT) > SECTION_SIZE_BITS >> > > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> > > > In file included from include/linux/gfp.h:6:0, >> > > > from include/linux/mm.h:10, >> > > > from mm//swap.c:16: >> > > > > > include/linux/mmzone.h:1088:6: warning: "pageblock_order" is not defined, evaluates to 0 [-Wundef] >> > > > #if (pageblock_order + PAGE_SHIFT) > SECTION_SIZE_BITS >> > > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> > > > >> > > > vim +/pageblock_order +1088 include/linux/mmzone.h >> > > > >> > > > 1087 >> > > > > 1088 #if (pageblock_order + PAGE_SHIFT) > SECTION_SIZE_BITS >> > > > 1089 #error Allocator pageblock_order exceeds SECTION_SIZE >> > > > 1090 #endif >> > > > 1091 >> > > > >> > > I took a look at the latest code, at line 1082 of the same file uses >> > > pageblock_order. And I apply this patch on top of v4.20-rc5, the build >> > > looks good to me. >> > > >> > > Confused why this introduce an compile error. >> > Hi Wei, >> > >> > we could reproduce the warnings with using make.cross. >> > >> That's interesting. >> >> Do you see this file already use pageblock_order in line 1081? >> >> Is this one report warning? >> > >both questions is yes. > Sounds interesting :-) I don't have a power machine and we may drop this patch as discussed, so I won't look into this now. Thanks for your effort. >Best Regards, >Rong Chen > > -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me