From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it1-f200.google.com (mail-it1-f200.google.com [209.85.166.200]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F478E00E5 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 06:43:22 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-it1-f200.google.com with SMTP id 128so5532750itw.8 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 03:43:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from huawei.com (szxga05-in.huawei.com. [45.249.212.191]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b2si8500380iod.1.2018.12.12.03.43.20 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Dec 2018 03:43:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 11:42:36 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: Add memory hotplug support Message-ID: <20181212114236.000030c9@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <331db1485b4c8c3466217e16a1e1f05618e9bae8.1544553902.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> References: <331db1485b4c8c3466217e16a1e1f05618e9bae8.1544553902.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Robin Murphy Cc: will.deacon@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cyrilc@xilinx.com, james.morse@arm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 18:48:48 +0000 Robin Murphy wrote: > Wire up the basic support for hot-adding memory. Since memory hotplug > is fairly tightly coupled to sparsemem, we tweak pfn_valid() to also > cross-check the presence of a section in the manner of the generic > implementation, before falling back to memblock to check for no-map > regions within a present section as before. By having arch_add_memory(() > create the linear mapping first, this then makes everything work in the > way that __add_section() expects. > > We expect hotplug to be ACPI-driven, so the swapper_pg_dir updates > should be safe from races by virtue of the global device hotplug lock. > > Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy Hi Robin, What tree is this against? rodata_full doesn't seem be exist for me on 4.20-rc6. With v1 I did the 'new node' test and it looked good except for an old cgroups warning that has always been there (and has been on my list to track down for a long time). Jonathan > --- > > v2: Handle page-mappings-only cases appropriately > > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 3 +++ > arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 8 ++++++++ > arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 10 ++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 38 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > index 4dbef530cf58..be423fda5cec 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > @@ -261,6 +261,9 @@ config ZONE_DMA32 > config HAVE_GENERIC_GUP > def_bool y > > +config ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTPLUG > + def_bool y > + > config SMP > def_bool y > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c > index 6cde00554e9b..4bfe0fc9edac 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c > @@ -291,6 +291,14 @@ int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn) > > if ((addr >> PAGE_SHIFT) != pfn) > return 0; > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM > + if (pfn_to_section_nr(pfn) >= NR_MEM_SECTIONS) > + return 0; > + > + if (!valid_section(__nr_to_section(pfn_to_section_nr(pfn)))) > + return 0; > +#endif > return memblock_is_map_memory(addr); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(pfn_valid); > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c > index 674c409a8ce4..da513a1facf4 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c > @@ -1046,3 +1046,20 @@ int pud_free_pmd_page(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long addr) > pmd_free(NULL, table); > return 1; > } > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG > +int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size, struct vmem_altmap *altmap, > + bool want_memblock) > +{ > + int flags = 0; > + > + if (rodata_full || debug_pagealloc_enabled()) > + flags = NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_CONT_MAPPINGS; > + > + __create_pgd_mapping(swapper_pg_dir, start, __phys_to_virt(start), > + size, PAGE_KERNEL, pgd_pgtable_alloc, flags); > + > + return __add_pages(nid, start >> PAGE_SHIFT, size >> PAGE_SHIFT, > + altmap, want_memblock); > +} > +#endif > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c > index 27a31efd9e8e..ae34e3a1cef1 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c > @@ -466,3 +466,13 @@ void __init arm64_numa_init(void) > > numa_init(dummy_numa_init); > } > + > +/* > + * We hope that we will be hotplugging memory on nodes we already know about, > + * such that acpi_get_node() succeeds and we never fall back to this... > + */ > +int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 addr) > +{ > + pr_warn("Unknown node for memory at 0x%llx, assuming node 0\n", addr); > + return 0; > +}