From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk1-f198.google.com (mail-qk1-f198.google.com [209.85.222.198]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996B48E004D for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 23:48:33 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qk1-f198.google.com with SMTP id k66so12287968qkf.1 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:48:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com. [209.132.183.28]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x46si4975321qth.369.2018.12.10.20.48.32 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:48:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:48:25 +0800 From: Peter Xu Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: thp: fix soft dirty for migration when split Message-ID: <20181211044825.GA3260@xz-x1> References: <20181206084604.17167-1-peterx@redhat.com> <20181207033407.GB10726@xz-x1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Konstantin Khlebnikov Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrea Arcangeli , Andrew Morton , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Matthew Wilcox , Michal Hocko , dave.jiang@intel.com, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , jrdr.linux@gmail.com, =?utf-8?B?0JrQvtC90YHRgtCw0L3RgtC40L0g0KXQu9C10LHQvdC40LrQvtCy?= , linux-mm@kvack.org On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 07:50:52PM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 6:34 AM Peter Xu wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 04:46:04PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote: > > > When splitting a huge migrating PMD, we'll transfer the soft dirty bit > > > from the huge page to the small pages. However we're possibly using a > > > wrong data since when fetching the bit we're using pmd_soft_dirty() > > > upon a migration entry. Fix it up. > > > > Note that if my understanding is correct about the problem then if > > without the patch there is chance to lose some of the dirty bits in > > the migrating pmd pages (on x86_64 we're fetching bit 11 which is part > > of swap offset instead of bit 2) and it could potentially corrupt the > > memory of an userspace program which depends on the dirty bit. > > It seems this code is broken in case of pmd_migraion: > > old_pmd = pmdp_invalidate(vma, haddr, pmd); > > #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_THP_MIGRATION > pmd_migration = is_pmd_migration_entry(old_pmd); > if (pmd_migration) { > swp_entry_t entry; > > entry = pmd_to_swp_entry(old_pmd); > page = pfn_to_page(swp_offset(entry)); > } else > #endif > page = pmd_page(old_pmd); > VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!page_count(page), page); > page_ref_add(page, HPAGE_PMD_NR - 1); > if (pmd_dirty(old_pmd)) > SetPageDirty(page); > write = pmd_write(old_pmd); > young = pmd_young(old_pmd); > soft_dirty = pmd_soft_dirty(old_pmd); > > Not just soft_dirt - all bits (dirty, write, young) have diffrent encoding > or not present at all for migration entry. Hi, Konstantin, Actually I noticed it but I thought it didn't hurt since both write/young flags are not used at all when applying to the small pages when pmd_migration==true. But indeed there's at least an unexpected side effect of an extra call to SetPageDirty() that I missed. I'll repost soon. Thanks! -- Peter Xu