From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2546D8E0004 for ; Sat, 8 Dec 2018 12:03:37 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id o63-v6so2683550wma.2 for ; Sat, 08 Dec 2018 09:03:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from newverein.lst.de (verein.lst.de. [213.95.11.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e18si5055197wra.391.2018.12.08.09.03.35 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 08 Dec 2018 09:03:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2018 18:03:34 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: use generic DMA mapping code in powerpc V4 Message-ID: <20181208170334.GB15020@lst.de> References: <20181114082314.8965-1-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181114082314.8965-1-hch@lst.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Just as a warning: this series now has some conflicts with the dma mapping tree due to the ->mapping_error removal, and there might be some bigger ones if the direct calls for the direct mapping code series goes ahead. None of them affect the early part of the series that do not touch the actual dma_map_ops instances, though.