From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <owner-linux-mm@kvack.org>
Received: from mail-ed1-f69.google.com (mail-ed1-f69.google.com [209.85.208.69])
	by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 565338E0004
	for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Fri,  7 Dec 2018 10:56:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail-ed1-f69.google.com with SMTP id w2so2193248edc.13
        for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 07:56:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w17-v6si1363172ejf.128.2018.12.07.07.56.31
        for <linux-mm@kvack.org>
        (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Fri, 07 Dec 2018 07:56:31 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 16:56:27 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/alloc: fallback to first node if the wanted node
 offline
Message-ID: <20181207155627.GG1286@dhcp22.suse.cz>
References: <CAFgQCTsMdQSRFruZRGBuo30TjfiQ=sbrf9kUJAGgwN6uw+LsBw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFgQCTv7ADVW3WvB0tuqpL1U2MFGADA113MUm6ZmVcgvqyBfTA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181206121152.GH1286@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <CAFgQCTuqn32_pZrLBDNvC_0Aepv2F7KF7rk2nAbxmYF45KfT2w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181207075322.GS1286@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <CAFgQCTsFBUcOE9UKQ2vz=hg2FWp_QurZMQmJZ2wYLBqXkFHKHQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181207113044.GB1286@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <CAFgQCTuf95pJSWDc1BNQ=gN76aJ_dtxMRbAV9a28X6w8vapdMQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181207142240.GC1286@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <CAFgQCTuu54oZWKq_ppEvZFb4Mz31gVmsa37gTap+e9KbE=T0aQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAFgQCTuu54oZWKq_ppEvZFb4Mz31gVmsa37gTap+e9KbE=T0aQ@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
List-ID: <linux-mm.kvack.org>
To: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

On Fri 07-12-18 22:27:13, Pingfan Liu wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> index 1308f54..4dc497d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> @@ -754,18 +754,23 @@ void __init init_cpu_to_node(void)
>  {
>         int cpu;
>         u16 *cpu_to_apicid = early_per_cpu_ptr(x86_cpu_to_apicid);
> +       int node, nr;
> 
>         BUG_ON(cpu_to_apicid == NULL);
> +       nr = cpumask_weight(cpu_possible_mask);
> +
> +       /* bring up all possible node, since dev->numa_node */
> +       //should check acpi works for node possible,
> +       for_each_node(node)
> +               if (!node_online(node))
> +                       init_memory_less_node(node);

I suspect there is no change if you replace for_each_node by
	for_each_node_mask(nid, node_possible_map)

here. If that is the case then we are probably calling
free_area_init_node too early. I do not see it yet though.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs