From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
will.deacon@arm.com, jcm@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 4/7] arm64: mm: Offset TTBR1 to allow 52-bit PTRS_PER_PGD
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 11:21:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181207112102.GB23085@arrakis.emea.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181206225042.11548-5-steve.capper@arm.com>
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 10:50:39PM +0000, Steve Capper wrote:
> Enabling 52-bit VAs on arm64 requires that the PGD table expands from 64
> entries (for the 48-bit case) to 1024 entries. This quantity,
> PTRS_PER_PGD is used as follows to compute which PGD entry corresponds
> to a given virtual address, addr:
>
> pgd_index(addr) -> (addr >> PGDIR_SHIFT) & (PTRS_PER_PGD - 1)
>
> Userspace addresses are prefixed by 0's, so for a 48-bit userspace
> address, uva, the following is true:
> (uva >> PGDIR_SHIFT) & (1024 - 1) == (uva >> PGDIR_SHIFT) & (64 - 1)
>
> In other words, a 48-bit userspace address will have the same pgd_index
> when using PTRS_PER_PGD = 64 and 1024.
>
> Kernel addresses are prefixed by 1's so, given a 48-bit kernel address,
> kva, we have the following inequality:
> (kva >> PGDIR_SHIFT) & (1024 - 1) != (kva >> PGDIR_SHIFT) & (64 - 1)
>
> In other words a 48-bit kernel virtual address will have a different
> pgd_index when using PTRS_PER_PGD = 64 and 1024.
>
> If, however, we note that:
> kva = 0xFFFF << 48 + lower (where lower[63:48] == 0b)
> and, PGDIR_SHIFT = 42 (as we are dealing with 64KB PAGE_SIZE)
>
> We can consider:
> (kva >> PGDIR_SHIFT) & (1024 - 1) - (kva >> PGDIR_SHIFT) & (64 - 1)
> = (0xFFFF << 6) & 0x3FF - (0xFFFF << 6) & 0x3F // "lower" cancels out
> = 0x3C0
>
> In other words, one can switch PTRS_PER_PGD to the 52-bit value globally
> provided that they increment ttbr1_el1 by 0x3C0 * 8 = 0x1E00 bytes when
> running with 48-bit kernel VAs (TCR_EL1.T1SZ = 16).
>
> For kernel configuration where 52-bit userspace VAs are possible, this
> patch offsets ttbr1_el1 and sets PTRS_PER_PGD corresponding to the
> 52-bit value.
>
> Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-07 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-06 22:50 [PATCH V5 0/7] 52-bit userspace VAs Steve Capper
2018-12-06 22:50 ` [PATCH V5 1/7] mm: mmap: Allow for "high" userspace addresses Steve Capper
2018-12-07 19:56 ` Andrew Morton
2018-12-06 22:50 ` [PATCH V5 2/7] arm64: mm: Introduce DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW Steve Capper
2018-12-06 22:50 ` [PATCH V5 3/7] arm64: mm: Define arch_get_mmap_end, arch_get_mmap_base Steve Capper
2018-12-06 22:50 ` [PATCH V5 4/7] arm64: mm: Offset TTBR1 to allow 52-bit PTRS_PER_PGD Steve Capper
2018-12-07 11:21 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2018-12-07 12:04 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-12-06 22:50 ` [PATCH V5 5/7] arm64: mm: Prevent mismatched 52-bit VA support Steve Capper
2018-12-07 10:47 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-12-07 15:26 ` Will Deacon
2018-12-07 17:28 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-12-10 13:36 ` Will Deacon
2018-12-10 16:04 ` Steve Capper
2018-12-10 16:18 ` Will Deacon
2018-12-10 16:55 ` Steve Capper
2018-12-10 17:08 ` Steve Capper
2018-12-10 17:42 ` Steve Capper
2018-12-10 18:07 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-12-06 22:50 ` [PATCH V5 6/7] arm64: mm: introduce 52-bit userspace support Steve Capper
2018-12-07 11:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2018-12-06 22:50 ` [PATCH V5 7/7] arm64: mm: Allow forcing all userspace addresses to 52-bit Steve Capper
2018-12-10 19:34 ` [PATCH V5 0/7] 52-bit userspace VAs Will Deacon
2018-12-11 9:13 ` Steve Capper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181207112102.GB23085@arrakis.emea.arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=steve.capper@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox