linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tony Battersby <tonyb@cybernetics.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] dmapool: debug: prevent endless loop in case of corruption
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 12:18:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181204201801.GS10377@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181204121443.1430883634a6ecf5f4a6a4a2@linux-foundation.org>

On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 12:14:43PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 11:22:34 -0500 Tony Battersby <tonyb@cybernetics.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 11/13/18 1:36 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:46:35AM -0500, Tony Battersby wrote:
> > >> Prevent a possible endless loop with DMAPOOL_DEBUG enabled if a buggy
> > >> driver corrupts DMA pool memory.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Tony Battersby <tonyb@cybernetics.com>
> > > I like it!  Also, here you're using blks_per_alloc in a way which isn't
> > > normally in the performance path, but might be with the right config
> > > options.  With that, I withdraw my objection to the previous patch and
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> > >
> > > Andrew, can you funnel these in through your tree?  If you'd rather not,
> > > I don't mind stuffing them into a git tree and asking Linus to pull
> > > for 4.21.
> > >
> > No reply for 3 weeks, so adding Andrew Morton to recipient list.
> > 
> > Andrew, I have 9 dmapool patches ready for merging in 4.21.� See Matthew
> > Wilcox's request above.
> > 
> 
> I'll take a look, but I see that this v4 series has several review
> comments from Matthew which remain unresponded to.  Please attend to
> that.

I only had a review comment on 8/9, which I then withdrew during my review
of patch 9/9.  Unless I missed something during my re-review of my responses?

> Also, Andy had issues with the v2 series so it would be good to hear an
> update from him?

Certainly.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-04 20:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-12 15:46 Tony Battersby
2018-11-13  6:36 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-12-04 16:22   ` Tony Battersby
2018-12-04 20:14     ` Andrew Morton
2018-12-04 20:18       ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2018-12-04 20:28         ` Andrew Morton
2018-12-04 20:35           ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-12-04 20:30         ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-12-04 21:26           ` Tony Battersby
2018-12-04 22:05             ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181204201801.GS10377@bombadil.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=tonyb@cybernetics.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox