From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <owner-linux-mm@kvack.org>
Received: from mail-ed1-f70.google.com (mail-ed1-f70.google.com [209.85.208.70])
	by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 180876B6D97
	for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Tue,  4 Dec 2018 03:34:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail-ed1-f70.google.com with SMTP id w15so7871197edl.21
        for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 00:34:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-sor-f65.google.com (mail-sor-f65.google.com. [209.85.220.65])
        by mx.google.com with SMTPS id a37sor8471382edd.23.2018.12.04.00.34.29
        for <linux-mm@kvack.org>
        (Google Transport Security);
        Tue, 04 Dec 2018 00:34:29 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 08:34:28 +0000
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/alloc: fallback to first node if the wanted node
 offline
Message-ID: <20181204083428.emgcaomg6vulknaq@master>
Reply-To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
References: <1543892757-4323-1-git-send-email-kernelfans@gmail.com>
 <20181204065453.4rsyhtsk2aej4vim@master>
 <CAFgQCTvQBC11=4eGQ6T9vyB+KOznFCr4hjdg1wwD8GotSRWpDg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAFgQCTvQBC11=4eGQ6T9vyB+KOznFCr4hjdg1wwD8GotSRWpDg@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
List-ID: <linux-mm.kvack.org>
To: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
Cc: richard.weiyang@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 03:20:13PM +0800, Pingfan Liu wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 2:54 PM Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 11:05:57AM +0800, Pingfan Liu wrote:
>> >During my test on some AMD machine, with kexec -l nr_cpus=x option, the
>> >kernel failed to bootup, because some node's data struct can not be allocated,
>> >e.g, on x86, initialized by init_cpu_to_node()->init_memory_less_node(). But
>> >device->numa_node info is used as preferred_nid param for
>>
>> could we fix the preferred_nid before passed to
>> __alloc_pages_nodemask()?
>>
>Yes, we can doit too, but what is the gain?

node_zonelist() is used some places. If we are sure where the problem
is, it is not necessary to spread to other places.

>
>> BTW, I don't catch the function call flow to this point. Would you mind
>> giving me some hint?
>>
>You can track the code along slab_alloc() ->...->__alloc_pages_nodemask()

slab_alloc() pass NUMA_NO_NODE down, so I am lost in where the
preferred_nid is assigned.

>
>Thanks,
>Pingfan

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me