From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf1-f72.google.com (mail-lf1-f72.google.com [209.85.167.72]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A683C6B6A22 for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 11:29:13 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-lf1-f72.google.com with SMTP id l16so1581752lfc.8 for ; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 08:29:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from asavdk4.altibox.net (asavdk4.altibox.net. [109.247.116.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j13-v6si11494961lji.67.2018.12.03.08.29.11 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Dec 2018 08:29:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 17:29:08 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] arch: simplify several early memory allocations Message-ID: <20181203162908.GB4244@ravnborg.org> References: <1543852035-26634-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> <1543852035-26634-6-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1543852035-26634-6-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Mike Rapoport Cc: Andrew Morton , Arnd Bergmann , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , "David S. Miller" , Guan Xuetao , Greentime Hu , Jonas Bonn , Michael Ellerman , Michal Hocko , Michal Simek , Mark Salter , Paul Mackerras , Rich Felker , Russell King , Stefan Kristiansson , Stafford Horne , Vincent Chen , Yoshinori Sato , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Hi Mike. > index c37955d..2a17665 100644 > --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/prom_64.c > +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/prom_64.c > @@ -34,16 +34,13 @@ > > void * __init prom_early_alloc(unsigned long size) > { > - unsigned long paddr = memblock_phys_alloc(size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES); > - void *ret; > + void *ret = memblock_alloc(size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES); > > - if (!paddr) { > + if (!ret) { > prom_printf("prom_early_alloc(%lu) failed\n", size); > prom_halt(); > } > > - ret = __va(paddr); > - memset(ret, 0, size); > prom_early_allocated += size; > > return ret; memblock_alloc() calls memblock_alloc_try_nid(). And if allocation fails then memblock_alloc_try_nid() calls panic(). So will we ever hit the prom_halt() code? Do we have a panic() implementation that actually returns? > diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c b/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c > index 3c8aac2..52884f4 100644 > --- a/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c > +++ b/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c > @@ -1089,16 +1089,13 @@ static void __init allocate_node_data(int nid) > struct pglist_data *p; > unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn; > #ifdef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES > - unsigned long paddr; > > - paddr = memblock_phys_alloc_try_nid(sizeof(struct pglist_data), > - SMP_CACHE_BYTES, nid); > - if (!paddr) { > + NODE_DATA(nid) = memblock_alloc_node(sizeof(struct pglist_data), > + SMP_CACHE_BYTES, nid); > + if (!NODE_DATA(nid)) { > prom_printf("Cannot allocate pglist_data for nid[%d]\n", nid); > prom_halt(); > } > - NODE_DATA(nid) = __va(paddr); > - memset(NODE_DATA(nid), 0, sizeof(struct pglist_data)); > > NODE_DATA(nid)->node_id = nid; > #endif Same here. I did not look at the other cases. Sam