linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
	mhocko@suse.com, osalvador@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm, hotplug: move init_currently_empty_zone() under zone_span_lock protection
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2018 00:27:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181201002709.ggybtqza6c7hyqrn@master> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dd8f1834-769e-d341-58dc-50a81fe0c0ec@redhat.com>

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:30:22AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>On 30.11.18 07:58, Wei Yang wrote:
>> During online_pages phase, pgdat->nr_zones will be updated in case this
>> zone is empty.
>> 
>> Currently the online_pages phase is protected by the global lock
>> mem_hotplug_begin(), which ensures there is no contention during the
>> update of nr_zones. But this global lock introduces scalability issues.
>> 
>> The patch moves init_currently_empty_zone under both zone_span_writelock
>> and pgdat_resize_lock because both the pgdat state is changed (nr_zones)
>> and the zone's start_pfn. Also this patch changes the documentation
>> of node_size_lock to include the protectioin of nr_zones.
>
>s/protectioin/protection/
>
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
>> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
>> CC: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>> 
>> ---
>> David, I may not catch you exact comment on the code or changelog. If I
>> missed, just let me know.
>
>I guess I would have rewritten it to something like the following
>
>"
>Currently the online_pages phase is protected by two global locks
>(device_device_hotplug_lock and mem_hotplug_lock). Especial the latter
>can result in scalability issues, as it will slow down code relying on
>get_online_mems(). Let's prepare code for not having to rely on
>get_online_mems() but instead some more fine grained locks.

I am not sure why we specify get_online_mems() here. mem_hotplug_lock is
grabed in many places besides this one. In my mind, each place introduce
scalability issue, not only this one.

Or you want to say, the mem_hotplug_lock will introduce scalability
issue in two place:

  * hotplug process itself
  * slab allocation process

The second one is more critical. And this is what we try to address?

>
>During online_pages phase, pgdat->nr_zones will be updated in case the
>zone is empty. Right now mem_hotplug_lock ensures that there is no
>contention during the update of nr_zones.
>
>The patch moves init_currently_empty_zone under both zone_span_writelock
>and pgdat_resize_lock because both the pgdat state is changed (nr_zones)
>and the zone's start_pfn. Also this patch changes the documentation
>of node_size_lock to include the protection of nr_zones.
>"
>
>Does that make sense?
>
>> 
>> ---
>> v3:
>>   * slightly modify the last paragraph of changelog based on Michal's
>>     comment
>> v2:
>>   * commit log changes
>>   * modify the code in move_pfn_range_to_zone() instead of in
>>     init_currently_empty_zone()
>>   * pgdat_resize_lock documentation change
>> ---
>>  include/linux/mmzone.h | 7 ++++---
>>  mm/memory_hotplug.c    | 5 ++---
>>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
>> index 3d0c472438d2..37d9c5c3faa6 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
>> @@ -635,9 +635,10 @@ typedef struct pglist_data {
>>  #endif
>>  #if defined(CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG) || defined(CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT)
>>  	/*
>> -	 * Must be held any time you expect node_start_pfn, node_present_pages
>> -	 * or node_spanned_pages stay constant.  Holding this will also
>> -	 * guarantee that any pfn_valid() stays that way.
>> +	 * Must be held any time you expect node_start_pfn,
>> +	 * node_present_pages, node_spanned_pages or nr_zones stay constant.
>> +	 * Holding this will also guarantee that any pfn_valid() stays that
>> +	 * way.
>>  	 *
>>  	 * pgdat_resize_lock() and pgdat_resize_unlock() are provided to
>>  	 * manipulate node_size_lock without checking for CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
>> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> index 61972da38d93..f626e7e5f57b 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> @@ -742,14 +742,13 @@ void __ref move_pfn_range_to_zone(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
>>  	int nid = pgdat->node_id;
>>  	unsigned long flags;
>>  
>> -	if (zone_is_empty(zone))
>> -		init_currently_empty_zone(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
>> -
>>  	clear_zone_contiguous(zone);
>>  
>>  	/* TODO Huh pgdat is irqsave while zone is not. It used to be like that before */
>>  	pgdat_resize_lock(pgdat, &flags);
>>  	zone_span_writelock(zone);
>> +	if (zone_is_empty(zone))
>> +		init_currently_empty_zone(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
>>  	resize_zone_range(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
>>  	zone_span_writeunlock(zone);
>>  	resize_pgdat_range(pgdat, start_pfn, nr_pages);
>> 
>
>
>-- 
>
>Thanks,
>
>David / dhildenb

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-01  0:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-20  1:48 [PATCH] mm, hotplug: protect nr_zones with pgdat_resize_lock() Wei Yang
2018-11-20  7:31 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-20  7:58   ` osalvador
2018-11-20  8:48     ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-21  2:52     ` Wei Yang
2018-11-21  7:15       ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-22  1:52         ` Wei Yang
2018-11-22  8:39           ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-26  2:28         ` Wei Yang
2018-11-26  8:16           ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-26  9:06             ` Wei Yang
2018-11-26 10:03               ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-27  0:18                 ` Wei Yang
2018-11-27  3:12             ` Wei Yang
2018-11-27 13:16               ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-27 23:56                 ` Wei Yang
2018-11-21  8:24       ` osalvador
2018-11-21  2:44   ` Wei Yang
2018-11-21  7:14     ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-22 10:12 ` [PATCH v2] mm, hotplug: move init_currently_empty_zone() under zone_span_lock protection Wei Yang
2018-11-22 10:15   ` Wei Yang
2018-11-22 10:29     ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-22 14:27       ` Wei Yang
2018-11-22 10:37   ` osalvador
2018-11-22 14:28     ` Wei Yang
2018-11-22 15:26   ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-22 21:28     ` Wei Yang
2018-11-22 21:53       ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-22 23:53         ` Wei Yang
2018-11-23  8:42     ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-23  8:46       ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-26  1:44         ` Wei Yang
2018-11-26  9:24           ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-27  0:23             ` Wei Yang
2018-11-30  6:58   ` [PATCH v3] " Wei Yang
2018-11-30  9:30     ` David Hildenbrand
2018-12-01  0:27       ` Wei Yang [this message]
2018-12-03 10:09         ` David Hildenbrand
2018-12-03 20:37           ` Wei Yang
2018-12-03 20:50     ` [PATCH v4] " Wei Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181201002709.ggybtqza6c7hyqrn@master \
    --to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox