From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
mhocko@suse.com, osalvador@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm, hotplug: move init_currently_empty_zone() under zone_span_lock protection
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2018 00:27:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181201002709.ggybtqza6c7hyqrn@master> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dd8f1834-769e-d341-58dc-50a81fe0c0ec@redhat.com>
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:30:22AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>On 30.11.18 07:58, Wei Yang wrote:
>> During online_pages phase, pgdat->nr_zones will be updated in case this
>> zone is empty.
>>
>> Currently the online_pages phase is protected by the global lock
>> mem_hotplug_begin(), which ensures there is no contention during the
>> update of nr_zones. But this global lock introduces scalability issues.
>>
>> The patch moves init_currently_empty_zone under both zone_span_writelock
>> and pgdat_resize_lock because both the pgdat state is changed (nr_zones)
>> and the zone's start_pfn. Also this patch changes the documentation
>> of node_size_lock to include the protectioin of nr_zones.
>
>s/protectioin/protection/
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
>> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
>> CC: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>>
>> ---
>> David, I may not catch you exact comment on the code or changelog. If I
>> missed, just let me know.
>
>I guess I would have rewritten it to something like the following
>
>"
>Currently the online_pages phase is protected by two global locks
>(device_device_hotplug_lock and mem_hotplug_lock). Especial the latter
>can result in scalability issues, as it will slow down code relying on
>get_online_mems(). Let's prepare code for not having to rely on
>get_online_mems() but instead some more fine grained locks.
I am not sure why we specify get_online_mems() here. mem_hotplug_lock is
grabed in many places besides this one. In my mind, each place introduce
scalability issue, not only this one.
Or you want to say, the mem_hotplug_lock will introduce scalability
issue in two place:
* hotplug process itself
* slab allocation process
The second one is more critical. And this is what we try to address?
>
>During online_pages phase, pgdat->nr_zones will be updated in case the
>zone is empty. Right now mem_hotplug_lock ensures that there is no
>contention during the update of nr_zones.
>
>The patch moves init_currently_empty_zone under both zone_span_writelock
>and pgdat_resize_lock because both the pgdat state is changed (nr_zones)
>and the zone's start_pfn. Also this patch changes the documentation
>of node_size_lock to include the protection of nr_zones.
>"
>
>Does that make sense?
>
>>
>> ---
>> v3:
>> * slightly modify the last paragraph of changelog based on Michal's
>> comment
>> v2:
>> * commit log changes
>> * modify the code in move_pfn_range_to_zone() instead of in
>> init_currently_empty_zone()
>> * pgdat_resize_lock documentation change
>> ---
>> include/linux/mmzone.h | 7 ++++---
>> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 5 ++---
>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
>> index 3d0c472438d2..37d9c5c3faa6 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
>> @@ -635,9 +635,10 @@ typedef struct pglist_data {
>> #endif
>> #if defined(CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG) || defined(CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT)
>> /*
>> - * Must be held any time you expect node_start_pfn, node_present_pages
>> - * or node_spanned_pages stay constant. Holding this will also
>> - * guarantee that any pfn_valid() stays that way.
>> + * Must be held any time you expect node_start_pfn,
>> + * node_present_pages, node_spanned_pages or nr_zones stay constant.
>> + * Holding this will also guarantee that any pfn_valid() stays that
>> + * way.
>> *
>> * pgdat_resize_lock() and pgdat_resize_unlock() are provided to
>> * manipulate node_size_lock without checking for CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
>> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> index 61972da38d93..f626e7e5f57b 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> @@ -742,14 +742,13 @@ void __ref move_pfn_range_to_zone(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
>> int nid = pgdat->node_id;
>> unsigned long flags;
>>
>> - if (zone_is_empty(zone))
>> - init_currently_empty_zone(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
>> -
>> clear_zone_contiguous(zone);
>>
>> /* TODO Huh pgdat is irqsave while zone is not. It used to be like that before */
>> pgdat_resize_lock(pgdat, &flags);
>> zone_span_writelock(zone);
>> + if (zone_is_empty(zone))
>> + init_currently_empty_zone(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
>> resize_zone_range(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
>> zone_span_writeunlock(zone);
>> resize_pgdat_range(pgdat, start_pfn, nr_pages);
>>
>
>
>--
>
>Thanks,
>
>David / dhildenb
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-01 0:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-20 1:48 [PATCH] mm, hotplug: protect nr_zones with pgdat_resize_lock() Wei Yang
2018-11-20 7:31 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-20 7:58 ` osalvador
2018-11-20 8:48 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-21 2:52 ` Wei Yang
2018-11-21 7:15 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-22 1:52 ` Wei Yang
2018-11-22 8:39 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-26 2:28 ` Wei Yang
2018-11-26 8:16 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-26 9:06 ` Wei Yang
2018-11-26 10:03 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-27 0:18 ` Wei Yang
2018-11-27 3:12 ` Wei Yang
2018-11-27 13:16 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-27 23:56 ` Wei Yang
2018-11-21 8:24 ` osalvador
2018-11-21 2:44 ` Wei Yang
2018-11-21 7:14 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-22 10:12 ` [PATCH v2] mm, hotplug: move init_currently_empty_zone() under zone_span_lock protection Wei Yang
2018-11-22 10:15 ` Wei Yang
2018-11-22 10:29 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-22 14:27 ` Wei Yang
2018-11-22 10:37 ` osalvador
2018-11-22 14:28 ` Wei Yang
2018-11-22 15:26 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-22 21:28 ` Wei Yang
2018-11-22 21:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-22 23:53 ` Wei Yang
2018-11-23 8:42 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-23 8:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-26 1:44 ` Wei Yang
2018-11-26 9:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-27 0:23 ` Wei Yang
2018-11-30 6:58 ` [PATCH v3] " Wei Yang
2018-11-30 9:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-12-01 0:27 ` Wei Yang [this message]
2018-12-03 10:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-12-03 20:37 ` Wei Yang
2018-12-03 20:50 ` [PATCH v4] " Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181201002709.ggybtqza6c7hyqrn@master \
--to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox