From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, lersek@redhat.com,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, aarcange@redhat.com,
rientjes@google.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
mhocko@suse.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: page_mapped: don't assume compound page is huge or THP
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:19:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181130101953.u4owfaqmaq2osuod@kshutemo-mobl1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eabca57aa14f4df723173b24891f4a2d9c501f21.1543526537.git.jstancek@redhat.com>
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:53:48PM +0100, Jan Stancek wrote:
> LTP proc01 testcase has been observed to rarely trigger crashes
> on arm64:
> page_mapped+0x78/0xb4
> stable_page_flags+0x27c/0x338
> kpageflags_read+0xfc/0x164
> proc_reg_read+0x7c/0xb8
> __vfs_read+0x58/0x178
> vfs_read+0x90/0x14c
> SyS_read+0x60/0xc0
>
> Issue is that page_mapped() assumes that if compound page is not
> huge, then it must be THP. But if this is 'normal' compound page
> (COMPOUND_PAGE_DTOR), then following loop can keep running until
> it tries to read from memory that isn't mapped and triggers a panic:
> for (i = 0; i < hpage_nr_pages(page); i++) {
> if (atomic_read(&page[i]._mapcount) >= 0)
> return true;
> }
>
> I could replicate this on x86 (v4.20-rc4-98-g60b548237fed) only
> with a custom kernel module [1] which:
> - allocates compound page (PAGEC) of order 1
> - allocates 2 normal pages (COPY), which are initialized to 0xff
> (to satisfy _mapcount >= 0)
> - 2 PAGEC page structs are copied to address of first COPY page
> - second page of COPY is marked as not present
> - call to page_mapped(COPY) now triggers fault on access to 2nd COPY
> page at offset 0x30 (_mapcount)
>
> [1] https://github.com/jstancek/reproducers/blob/master/kernel/page_mapped_crash/repro.c
>
> This patch modifies page_mapped() to check for 'normal'
> compound pages (COMPOUND_PAGE_DTOR).
>
> Debugged-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/mm.h | 9 +++++++++
> mm/util.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 5411de93a363..18b0bb953f92 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -700,6 +700,15 @@ static inline compound_page_dtor *get_compound_page_dtor(struct page *page)
> return compound_page_dtors[page[1].compound_dtor];
> }
>
> +static inline int PageNormalCompound(struct page *page)
> +{
> + if (!PageCompound(page))
> + return 0;
> +
> + page = compound_head(page);
> + return page[1].compound_dtor == COMPOUND_PAGE_DTOR;
> +}
> +
> static inline unsigned int compound_order(struct page *page)
> {
> if (!PageHead(page))
> diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
> index 8bf08b5b5760..06c1640cb7b3 100644
> --- a/mm/util.c
> +++ b/mm/util.c
> @@ -478,6 +478,8 @@ bool page_mapped(struct page *page)
> return true;
> if (PageHuge(page))
> return false;
> + if (PageNormalCompound(page))
> + return false;
> for (i = 0; i < hpage_nr_pages(page); i++) {
> if (atomic_read(&page[i]._mapcount) >= 0)
> return true;
Thanks for catching this.
But I think the right fix would be to change the loop condition:
for (i = 0; i < (1 << compund_order(page)); i++) {
Non-THP compound page also can be mapped and we need to check mapcount of
subpages.
Any objections?
If not, please update the patch.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-30 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-29 21:53 Jan Stancek
2018-11-30 10:19 ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2018-11-30 12:06 ` [PATCH v2] " Jan Stancek
2018-11-30 12:18 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-30 12:36 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-11-30 12:45 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-30 12:55 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-11-30 15:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-12-03 10:23 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-12-03 11:28 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-01-04 21:56 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-02-04 14:38 ` Lars Persson
2019-02-05 7:14 ` Jan Stancek
2019-02-18 13:43 ` Lars Persson
2019-02-18 13:50 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181130101953.u4owfaqmaq2osuod@kshutemo-mobl1 \
--to=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox