From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, jweiner@fb.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, show_mem: drop pgdat_resize_lock in show_mem()
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 15:04:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181129150449.desiutez735agyau@master> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181129081703.GN6923@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 09:17:03AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
>On Thu 29-11-18 05:08:15, Wei Yang wrote:
>> Function show_mem() is used to print system memory status when user
>> requires or fail to allocate memory. Generally, this is a best effort
>> information and not willing to affect core mm subsystem.
>
>I would drop the part after and
>
>> The data protected by pgdat_resize_lock is mostly correct except there is:
>>
>> * page struct defer init
>> * memory hotplug
>
>This is more confusing than helpful. I would just drop it.
>
>The changelog doesn't explain what is done and why. The second one is
>much more important. I would say this
>
>"
>Function show_mem() is used to print system memory status when user
>requires or fail to allocate memory. Generally, this is a best effort
>information so any races with memory hotplug (or very theoretically an
>early initialization) should be toleratable and the worst that could
>happen is to print an imprecise node state.
>
>Drop the resize lock because this is the only place which might hold the
As I mentioned in https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10689759/, there is
one place used in __remove_zone(). I don't get your suggestion of this
place. And is __remove_zone() could be called in IRQ context?
>lock from the interrupt context and so all other callers might use a
>simple spinlock. Even though this doesn't solve any real issue it makes
>the code easier to follow and tiny more effective.
>"
>
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-29 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-28 21:08 Wei Yang
2018-11-28 22:07 ` Andrew Morton
2018-11-29 1:52 ` Wei Yang
2018-11-29 8:17 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-29 9:32 ` Wei Yang
2018-11-29 15:04 ` Wei Yang [this message]
2018-11-29 15:49 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-29 16:05 ` Wei Yang
2018-11-29 16:18 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-29 23:49 ` Wei Yang
2018-11-29 23:55 ` [PATCH v2] " Wei Yang
2018-11-30 8:17 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-30 8:54 ` osalvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181129150449.desiutez735agyau@master \
--to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jweiner@fb.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox