From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: warn only once if page table misaccounting is detected
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 17:29:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181127162916.GB6923@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181127143638.GE3625@osiris>
On Tue 27-11-18 15:36:38, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 02:19:16PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 27-11-18 09:36:03, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > > Use pr_alert_once() instead of pr_alert() if page table misaccounting
> > > has been detected.
> > >
> > > If this happens once it is very likely that there will be numerous
> > > other occurrence as well, which would flood dmesg and the console with
> > > hardly any added information. Therefore print the warning only once.
> >
> > Have you actually experience a flood of these messages? Is one per mm
> > message really that much?
>
> Yes, I did. Since in this case all compat processes caused the message
> to appear, I saw thousands of these messages.
This means something went colossally wrong and seeing an avalanche of
messages might be actually helpful because you can at least see the
pattern. I wonder whether the underlying issue would be obvious from a
single instance.
Maybe we want ratelimit instead?
> > If yes why rss counters do not exhibit the same problem?
>
> No rss counter messages appeared. Or do you suggest that the other
> pr_alert() within check_mm() should also be changed?
Whatever we go with (and I do not have a strong opinion here) we should
be consistent I believe.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-27 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-27 8:36 Heiko Carstens
2018-11-27 8:46 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-11-27 13:19 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-27 14:36 ` Heiko Carstens
2018-11-27 16:29 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2018-11-27 15:52 ` Sean Christopherson
2018-11-27 15:55 ` William Kucharski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181127162916.GB6923@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox