From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux MM" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"Intel Graphics Development" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"DRI Development" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"David Rientjes" <rientjes@google.com>,
"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: Check if mmu notifier callbacks are allowed to fail
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 13:30:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181123123057.GK4266@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181123111557.GG8625@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 12:15:57PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 22-11-18 17:51:04, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Just a bit of paranoia, since if we start pushing this deep into
> > callchains it's hard to spot all places where an mmu notifier
> > implementation might fail when it's not allowed to.
>
> What does WARN give you more than the existing pr_info? Is really
> backtrace that interesting?
Automated tools have to ignore everything at info level (there's too much
of that). I guess I could do something like
if (blockable)
pr_warn(...)
else
pr_info(...)
WARN() is simply my goto tool for getting something at warning level
dumped into dmesg. But I think the pr_warn with the callback function
should be enough indeed.
If you wonder where all the info level stuff happens that we have to
ignore: suspend/resume is a primary culprit (fairly important for
gfx/desktops), but there's a bunch of other places. Even if we ignore
everything at info and below we still need filters because some drivers
are a bit too trigger-happy (i915 definitely included I guess, so everyone
contributes to this problem).
Cheers, Daniel
>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> > Cc: "Christian K�nig" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> > Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> > Cc: "J�r�me Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>
> > Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> > Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> > ---
> > mm/mmu_notifier.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/mmu_notifier.c b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
> > index 5119ff846769..59e102589a25 100644
> > --- a/mm/mmu_notifier.c
> > +++ b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
> > @@ -190,6 +190,8 @@ int __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > pr_info("%pS callback failed with %d in %sblockable context.\n",
> > mn->ops->invalidate_range_start, _ret,
> > !blockable ? "non-" : "");
> > + WARN(blockable,"%pS callback failure not allowed\n",
> > + mn->ops->invalidate_range_start);
> > ret = _ret;
> > }
> > }
> > --
> > 2.19.1
> >
>
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-23 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-22 16:51 [PATCH 0/3] RFC: mmu notifier debug checks Daniel Vetter
2018-11-22 16:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: Check if mmu notifier callbacks are allowed to fail Daniel Vetter
2018-11-22 16:53 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2018-11-23 8:49 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-23 11:14 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-22 18:50 ` Koenig, Christian
2018-11-23 11:15 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-23 12:30 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2018-11-23 12:43 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-23 13:15 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-23 13:30 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-22 16:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm, notifier: Catch sleeping/blocking for !blockable Daniel Vetter
2018-11-22 18:55 ` Koenig, Christian
2018-11-23 8:46 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-23 10:14 ` Christian König
2018-11-23 11:12 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-23 12:38 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-23 12:46 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-23 13:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-23 13:23 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-11-22 16:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm, notifier: Add a lockdep map for invalidate_range_start Daniel Vetter
2018-11-27 7:49 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-27 16:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2018-11-27 17:28 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-27 17:33 ` Chris Wilson
2018-11-27 17:39 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181123123057.GK4266@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox