linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com,
	dave.hansen@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: fix calculation of pgdat->nr_zones
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 03:22:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181120032242.joduflm2tndr6imq@master> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fc661a9c-3cde-8e43-a05d-f26817ba6e8e@arm.com>

On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 12:08:54PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
>
>On 11/17/2018 07:50 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
>> Function init_currently_empty_zone() will adjust pgdat->nr_zones and set
>> it to 'zone_idx(zone) + 1' unconditionally. This is correct in the
>> normal case, while not exact in hot-plug situation.
>> 
>> This function is used in two places:
>> 
>>   * free_area_init_core()
>>   * move_pfn_range_to_zone()
>> 
>> In the first case, we are sure zone index increase monotonically. While
>> in the second one, this is under users control.
>
>So pgdat->nr_zones over counts the number of zones than what node has
>really got ? Does it affect all online options (online/online_kernel

Yes, nr_zones is not the literal meaning.

>/online_movable) if there are other higher index zones present on the
>node. 
>

The sequence matters, while usually we online page to ZONE_NORMAL, if I
am correct.

I may not get your question clearly.

>> 
>> One way to reproduce this is:
>> ----------------------------
>> 
>> 1. create a virtual machine with empty node1
>> 
>>    -m 4G,slots=32,maxmem=32G \
>>    -smp 4,maxcpus=8          \
>>    -numa node,nodeid=0,mem=4G,cpus=0-3 \
>>    -numa node,nodeid=1,mem=0G,cpus=4-7
>> 
>> 2. hot-add cpu 3-7
>> 
>>    cpu-add [3-7]
>> 
>> 2. hot-add memory to nod1
>> 
>>    object_add memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=1G
>>    device_add pc-dimm,id=dimm0,memdev=ram0,node=1
>> 
>> 3. online memory with following order
>> 
>>    echo online_movable > memory47/state
>>    echo online > memory40/state
>> 
>> After this, node1 will have its nr_zones equals to (ZONE_NORMAL + 1)
>> instead of (ZONE_MOVABLE + 1).
>
>Which prevents an over count I guess. Just wondering if you noticed this
>causing any real problem or some other side effects.
>

Not from my side.

I think Michal's rely may answer your question.

>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  mm/page_alloc.c | 4 +++-
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> index 5b7cd20dbaef..2d3c54201255 100644
>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> @@ -5823,8 +5823,10 @@ void __meminit init_currently_empty_zone(struct zone *zone,
>>  					unsigned long size)
>>  {
>>  	struct pglist_data *pgdat = zone->zone_pgdat;
>> +	int zone_idx = zone_idx(zone) + 1;
>>  
>> -	pgdat->nr_zones = zone_idx(zone) + 1;
>> +	if (zone_idx > pgdat->nr_zones)
>> +		pgdat->nr_zones = zone_idx;
>
>This seems to be correct if we try to init a zone (due to memory hotplug)
>in between index 0 and pgdat->nr_zones on an already populated node.

Yes, you are right.

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-20  3:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-17  2:20 Wei Yang
2018-11-19  6:38 ` Anshuman Khandual
2018-11-20  3:22   ` Wei Yang [this message]
2018-11-19  9:48 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-19 13:38   ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-04  9:05     ` Sasha Levin
2018-12-04  9:11       ` Wei Yang
2018-11-19 10:07 ` osalvador
2018-11-19 10:20   ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-19 14:15   ` Wei Yang
2018-11-19 14:23     ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-19 21:44       ` Wei Yang
2018-11-19 21:47         ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181120032242.joduflm2tndr6imq@master \
    --to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox