From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg1-f200.google.com (mail-pg1-f200.google.com [209.85.215.200]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E17B6B1DAE for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 21:28:47 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pg1-f200.google.com with SMTP id s22so310663pgv.8 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 18:28:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-sor-f65.google.com (mail-sor-f65.google.com. [209.85.220.65]) by mx.google.com with SMTPS id y9-v6sor51672638pfd.63.2018.11.19.18.28.46 for (Google Transport Security); Mon, 19 Nov 2018 18:28:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 11:28:41 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: Re: request for 4.14-stable: fd5f7cde1b85 ("printk: Never set console_may_schedule in console_trylock()") Message-ID: <20181120022841.GB4231@jagdpanzerIV> References: <20181111202045.vocb3dthuquf7h2y@debian> <20181119151807.GE5340@kroah.com> <20181120022315.GA4231@jagdpanzerIV> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181120022315.GA4231@jagdpanzerIV> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Sudip Mukherjee , stable@vger.kernel.org, Tetsuo Handa , Sergey Senozhatsky , Tejun Heo , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Cong Wang , Dave Hansen , Johannes Weiner , Mel Gorman , Michal Hocko , Vlastimil Babka , Peter Zijlstra , Linus Torvalds , Jan Kara , Mathieu Desnoyers , Byungchul Park , Pavel Machek , Steven Rostedt , Petr Mladek , Sergey Senozhatsky On (11/20/18 11:23), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (11/19/18 16:18), Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 08:20:45PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > This was not marked for stable but seems it should be in stable. > > > Please apply to your queue of 4.14-stable. > > > > Now queued up, thanks. > > Very sorry for the late reply! > > Greg, Sudip, the commit in question is known to be controversial Yikes!! PLEASE *IGNORE MY PREVIOUS EMAIL*! This is a *totally stupid* situation. I, somehow, got completely confused and looked at the wrong commit ID. Really sorry! Yes, backporting fd5f7cde1b85 for stable is OK, no real objections. -ss