From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf1-f199.google.com (mail-pf1-f199.google.com [209.85.210.199]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9515E6B0946 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 06:22:22 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pf1-f199.google.com with SMTP id j9-v6so18607141pfn.20 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 03:22:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t10-v6si26777994plh.416.2018.11.16.03.22.21 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Nov 2018 03:22:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 12:22:18 +0100 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm, memory_hotplug: be more verbose for memory offline failures Message-ID: <20181116112218.GH14706@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20181116083020.20260-1-mhocko@kernel.org> <20181116083020.20260-6-mhocko@kernel.org> <1542365221.3020.9.camel@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1542365221.3020.9.camel@suse.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: osalvador Cc: Andrew Morton , Baoquan He , Anshuman Khandual , linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML On Fri 16-11-18 11:47:01, osalvador wrote: > On Fri, 2018-11-16 at 09:30 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > From: Michal Hocko > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > > index a919ba5cb3c8..ec2c7916dc2d 100644 > > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > > @@ -7845,6 +7845,7 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, > > struct page *page, int count, > > return false; > > unmovable: > > WARN_ON_ONCE(zone_idx(zone) == ZONE_MOVABLE); > > + dump_page(pfn_to_page(pfn+iter), "unmovable page"); > > Would not be enough to just do: > > dump_page(page, "unmovable page". > > Unless I am missing something, page should already have the > right pfn? What if pfn_valid_within fails? You could have a pointer to the previous page. > > <--- > unsigned long check = pfn + iter; > page = pfn_to_page(check); > ---> > > The rest looks good to me > > Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador Thanks! -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs