From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ed1-f71.google.com (mail-ed1-f71.google.com [209.85.208.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B5486B0900 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 05:24:08 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-ed1-f71.google.com with SMTP id m45-v6so11578009edc.2 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 02:24:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m2si3100037edr.3.2018.11.16.02.24.07 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Nov 2018 02:24:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 11:24:05 +0100 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: use managed_zone() for more exact check in zone iteration Message-ID: <20181116102405.GF14706@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20181114235040.36180-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181114235040.36180-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Wei Yang Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" On Thu 15-11-18 07:50:40, Wei Yang wrote: [...] > @@ -1193,8 +1196,8 @@ static unsigned int count_free_highmem_pages(void) > struct zone *zone; > unsigned int cnt = 0; > > - for_each_populated_zone(zone) > - if (is_highmem(zone)) > + for_each_zone(zone) > + if (populated_zone(zone) && is_highmem(zone)) > cnt += zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES); this should be for_each_managed_zone because we only care about highmem zones which have pages in the allocator (NR_FREE_PAGES). > > return cnt; > @@ -1239,10 +1242,10 @@ static unsigned int count_highmem_pages(void) > struct zone *zone; > unsigned int n = 0; > > - for_each_populated_zone(zone) { > + for_each_zone(zone) { > unsigned long pfn, max_zone_pfn; > > - if (!is_highmem(zone)) > + if (!populated_zone(zone) || !is_highmem(zone)) > continue; > > mark_free_pages(zone); I am not familiar with this code much but I strongly suspect that we do want for_each_managed_zone here because saveable_highmem_page skips over all reserved pages which rules out the bootmem. But this should be double checked with Rafael (Cc-ed). Rafael, does this loop care about pages which are not managed by the page allocator? > @@ -1305,8 +1308,8 @@ static unsigned int count_data_pages(void) > unsigned long pfn, max_zone_pfn; > unsigned int n = 0; > > - for_each_populated_zone(zone) { > - if (is_highmem(zone)) > + for_each_zone(zone) { > + if (!populated_zone(zone) || is_highmem(zone)) > continue; > > mark_free_pages(zone); > @@ -1399,9 +1402,12 @@ static void copy_data_pages(struct memory_bitmap *copy_bm, > struct zone *zone; > unsigned long pfn; > > - for_each_populated_zone(zone) { > + for_each_zone(zone) { > unsigned long max_zone_pfn; > > + if (!populated_zone(zone)) > + continue; > + > mark_free_pages(zone); > max_zone_pfn = zone_end_pfn(zone); > for (pfn = zone->zone_start_pfn; pfn < max_zone_pfn; pfn++) > @@ -1717,7 +1723,10 @@ int hibernate_preallocate_memory(void) > saveable += save_highmem; > highmem = save_highmem; > size = 0; > - for_each_populated_zone(zone) { > + for_each_zone(zone) { > + if (!populated_zone(zone)) > + continue; > + > size += snapshot_additional_pages(zone); > if (is_highmem(zone)) > highmem += zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES); ditto for the above. > @@ -1863,8 +1872,8 @@ static int enough_free_mem(unsigned int nr_pages, unsigned int nr_highmem) > struct zone *zone; > unsigned int free = alloc_normal; > > - for_each_populated_zone(zone) > - if (!is_highmem(zone)) > + for_each_zone(zone) > + if (populated_zone(zone) && !is_highmem(zone)) > free += zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES); > > nr_pages += count_pages_for_highmem(nr_highmem); This one should be for_each_managed_zone (NR_FREE_PAGES) The rest looks good to me. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs