From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl1-f199.google.com (mail-pl1-f199.google.com [209.85.214.199]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEDD16B0003 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 18:18:13 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pl1-f199.google.com with SMTP id l9so6770481plt.7 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 15:18:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org. [140.211.169.12]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c4si10713445pll.412.2018.11.14.15.18.12 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Nov 2018 15:18:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 15:18:09 -0800 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm, memory_hotplug: do not clear numa_node association after hot_remove Message-Id: <20181114151809.06c43a508cc773d3a5ee04f4@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20181114071442.GB23419@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20181108100413.966-1-mhocko@kernel.org> <20181114071442.GB23419@dhcp22.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Michal Hocko Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Oscar Salvador , LKML , Wen Congyang , Tang Chen , Miroslav Benes , Vlastimil Babka On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 08:14:42 +0100 Michal Hocko wrote: > It seems there were no objections here. So can we have it in linux-next > for a wider testing a possibly target the next merge window? > top-posting sucks! I already have this queued for 4.21-rc1.