From: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
To: Timofey Titovets <timofey.titovets@synesis.ru>
Cc: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] KSM: allow dedup all tasks memory
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 19:16:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181113191653.btbzobquxtwt47z4@soleen.tm1wkky2jk1uhgkn0ivaxijq1c.bx.internal.cloudapp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGqmi763e4sZj1NHAk2fAjtPtb-kAZfcPq=KTH8B3sE-oDVvGw@mail.gmail.com>
On 18-11-13 21:54:13, Timofey Titovets wrote:
> D2N?, 13 D 1/2 D 3/4 N?D+-. 2018 D3. D2 21:35, Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>:
> >
> > On 18-11-13 21:17:42, Timofey Titovets wrote:
> > > D2N?, 13 D 1/2 D 3/4 N?D+-. 2018 D3. D2 20:59, Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>:
> > > >
> > > > On 18-11-13 15:23:50, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> > > > > Hi.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Yep. However, so far, it requires an application to explicitly opt in
> > > > > > to this behavior, so it's not all that bad. Your patch would remove
> > > > > > the requirement for application opt-in, which, in my opinion, makes
> > > > > > this way worse and reduces the number of applications for which this
> > > > > > is acceptable.
> > > > >
> > > > > The default is to maintain the old behaviour, so unless the explicit
> > > > > decision is made by the administrator, no extra risk is imposed.
> > > >
> > > > The new interface would be more tolerable if it honored MADV_UNMERGEABLE:
> > > >
> > > > KSM default on: merge everything except when MADV_UNMERGEABLE is
> > > > excplicitly set.
> > > >
> > > > KSM default off: merge only when MADV_MERGEABLE is set.
> > > >
> > > > The proposed change won't honor MADV_UNMERGEABLE, meaning that
> > > > application programmers won't have a way to prevent sensitive data to be
> > > > every merged. So, I think, we should keep allow an explicit opt-out
> > > > option for applications.
> > > >
> > >
> > > We just did not have VM/Madvise flag for that currently.
> > > Same as THP.
> > > Because all logic written with assumption, what we have exactly 2 states.
> > > Allow/Disallow (More like not allow).
> > >
> > > And if we try to add, that must be something like:
> > > MADV_FORBID_* to disallow something completely.
> >
> > No need to add new user flag MADV_FORBID, we should keep MADV_MERGEABLE
> > and MADV_UNMERGEABLE, but make them work so when MADV_UNMERGEABLE is
> > set, memory is indeed becomes always unmergeable regardless of ksm mode
> > of operation.
> >
> > To do the above in ksm_madvise(), a new state should be added, for example
> > instead of:
> >
> > case MADV_UNMERGEABLE:
> > *vm_flags &= ~VM_MERGEABLE;
> >
> > A new flag should be used:
> > *vm_flags |= VM_UNMERGEABLE;
> >
> > I think, without honoring MADV_UNMERGEABLE correctly, this patch won't
> > be accepted.
> >
> > Pasha
> >
>
> That must work, but we out of bit space in vm_flags [1].
> i.e. first 32 bits already defined, and other only accessible only on
> 64-bit machines.
So, grow vm_flags_t to 64-bit, or enable this feature on 64-bit only.
>
> 1. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/include/linux/mm.h#L219
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-13 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <<CAG48ez0ZprqUYGZFxcrY6U3Dnwt77q1NJXzzpsn1XNkRuXVppw@mail.gmail.com>
2018-11-13 14:23 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2018-11-13 17:59 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-11-13 18:17 ` Timofey Titovets
2018-11-13 18:35 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-11-13 18:54 ` Timofey Titovets
2018-11-13 19:16 ` Pavel Tatashin [this message]
2018-11-13 22:40 ` Timofey Titovets
2018-11-13 22:53 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-11-13 23:07 ` Timofey Titovets
2018-11-13 20:26 ` Jann Horn
2018-11-13 22:35 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-11-13 18:20 Timofey Titovets
[not found] <<20181112231344.7161-1-timofey.titovets@synesis.ru>
2018-11-13 11:06 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2018-11-13 11:56 ` Timofey Titovets
2018-11-13 16:33 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2018-11-13 17:10 ` Timofey Titovets
2018-11-13 17:27 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2018-11-13 17:44 ` Timofey Titovets
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-11-12 23:13 Timofey Titovets
2018-11-13 1:49 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-11-13 11:25 ` Timofey Titovets
2018-11-13 2:25 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-11-13 11:40 ` Timofey Titovets
2018-11-13 18:42 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-11-13 22:55 ` Timofey Titovets
2018-11-13 11:57 ` Jann Horn
2018-11-13 12:58 ` Timofey Titovets
2018-11-13 13:25 ` Jann Horn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181113191653.btbzobquxtwt47z4@soleen.tm1wkky2jk1uhgkn0ivaxijq1c.bx.internal.cloudapp.net \
--to=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
--cc=timofey.titovets@synesis.ru \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox